US & Israel attack Iran

Prestwich_Blue said:
I read it and it said it wasn't possible to say whether it was or not. Airstrikes go wrong and missiles in flight also do. Given the Iranians were sending missiles in all sorts of directions, that can't be ruled out.

Remember all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over the Israelis allegedly causing significant casualties at a hospital in Gaza? Turned out it was a Hamas rocket.
Click to expand...

Forensic Architecture

forensic-architecture.org forensic-architecture.org


IMG_20260302_200826.jpg
 
cookster said:
There are "nutball" regimes everywhere, including the US and Israel.
It's already be proven there was no imminent threat from Iran so, air strikes were not needed.

The death of Four US servicemen has received 1000x more coverage than the School in Iran.
Click to expand...
I don't get what you are saying. In Manchester, the death of one man on a bike gets more coverage than 100 people dying in a crash in Delhi. In Delhi, the death of one man on a bike gets more coverage than 100 people dying in a crash in Manchester.

Apparently 175,000 die every single day. Most of us mourn the death of our pet rabbit more than the deaths of 175,000 people we did not even know existed. Harsh but true.
 
cookster said:
Click to expand...

It's a completely ridiculous statement unless it's founded only in black and white evidence versus practical reality.

Iran possesses 440kg of 60% enriched U-235, and nobody knows where it is, not even the IAEA, that's enough for 10 nuclear bombs if they enrich it further. And going from 5% to 60% is harder than going from 60% to the 90% needed. U-235 is not enriched beyond 5% for powerplant uses.

They may not have a nuclear bomb now but what else did they plan to do with highly enriched U-235?

A second point is to look at the Fordow processing facility on a satellite map. This was a place with multiple layers of security and air defences. The Iranians worked hard to protect and move whatever was inside before the Americans wiped it out. So what was it used for?
 
We've got Guardiola said:
It's a completely ridiculous statement unless it's founded only in black and white evidence versus practical reality.

Iran possesses 440kg of 60% enriched U-235, and nobody knows where it is, not even the IAEA, that's enough for 10 nuclear bombs if they enrich it further. Going from 5% to 60% is harder than going from 60% to the 90% needed.

U-235 is not enriched beyond 5% for powerplant uses.

They may not have a nuclear bomb now but what else did they plan to do with highly enriched U-235?
Click to expand...
They’d probably be wise to make some kind of nuclear bomb as a deterrent to the lunatic running the world right now.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
You've resorted to insults and posting shite memes and videos as usual. Do you actually have the capacity to think critically for yourself? Or is everything you think driven by the apparent YouTube bubble you inhabit?
Click to expand...
Shite. capacity .think .yourself. apparent .you tube inhabit.
It is the murdering world you live in where all that matters is you're religious beliefs
And fuck all others.
Because your people were hard done by in the past it now entitles you to shit on whoever you want.
one would have thought the hardships you're people had been through you would be more tolerant of others but no you seem set on ditsruction of others who dont agree with you.
A nation that has endured so much with no compassion
 
cookster said:
The death of Four US servicemen has received 1000x more coverage than the School in Iran.
Click to expand...
There's been very little actual coverage of the four US servicemen, nobody has told us how or where to my knowledge.

And there is a good reason for little coverage of the school incident, and that is that none of our reporters are able to report from within Iran, and the state media haven't given much footage out either. In fact there's very little coverage of anything from with within Iran.
 
Pedestrian said:
They’d probably be wise to make some kind of nuclear bomb as a deterrent to the lunatic running the world right now.
Click to expand...
The policy of the previous Iranian regime was that they needed a nuclear programme for peaceful purposes such as power generation.

That is the basis of all negotiations with the rest of the world in relation to relieving sanctions, peace, etc etc. It is also the basis for IAEA proliferation monitoring because if Iran is actually making a nuclear bomb then what is the the point in monitoring?

Should we trust a regime that lies and denies making a nuclear bomb whilst doing everything to make a nuclear bomb?
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
You've resorted to insults and posting shite memes and videos as usual. Do you actually have the capacity to think critically for yourself? Or is everything you think driven by the apparent YouTube bubble you inhabit?
Click to expand...
To be fair, you labelled users of the forum ‘cunts’ the other day. I’d say that was insulting.
 
Earlyriser said:
That's what religion is... control and suppression
Click to expand...
Probably but you can equally call out other life style choices. Political parties? Remember the Hippies, Moonies those American sects where they usually all decide to die together? The North Korean devotion to their supreme leader is another example of political rather than religious control.

For me, a lapsed Catholic, I am totally against abortion, capital punishment and early death intervention (so pro life). Now I don't know whether that is because I have been pre programmed to believe that (which I was) or is it because I truly believe it (which I'd argue I do). i.e. Has my pre programming on the subject at an early age, even now, affected my ability to think straight on the subject? Don't they say show me the child at 7 and I will show you the man?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top