US Politics Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Blue Maverick said:
Bloody hell look on his wiki absolute cult follower
Click to expand...
I wonder where his allegiance lies??
From Wiki During his tenure he gave a lecture on leadership at the Moscow headquarters of the Russian military intelligence directorate GRU, the first American official to be admitted entry to the headquarters.
 
MillionMilesAway said:
Good old Tulsi Gabbard...

There's a trial against former CIA director John Brennan in the Trump Vengeance campaign.
About a dozen intelligence personnel were likely to be called to testify.
Gabbard revoked their security clearances in a big batch of vengeance.
As a result, they're not allowed to discuss classified information about Brennan.
Click to expand...
They can’t be stopped giving evidence in court. The judge may rule that classified data may only be given in camera.
 
Washington Post is reporting that Heggy has summoned all Generals and Admirals to a meeting next week, possibly summoning them from around the world.

No-one seems to know why.

(ordering them to swear allegiance to Agent Orange?)
 
BlueHammer85 said:
Click to expand...

I fear that we probably won't have a fair election in 2026 - Republican candidates who lose their election can challenge election results on the grounds of irregularities. In the House, this would occur according to the Federal Contested Election Act (FCEA) of 1969. Similar provisions exist in the Senate.

At the State level, Republican-controlled States might well refuse to certify election results that don't go their way.

And what's to stop the above from occurring? Nothing.
 
BlueMoonAcrossThePond said:
I fear that we probably won't have a fair election in 2026 - Republican candidates who lose their election can challenge election results on the grounds of irregularities. In the House, this would occur according to the Federal Contested Election Act (FCEA) of 1969. Similar provisions exist in the Senate.

At the State level, Republican-controlled States might well refuse to certify election results that don't go their way.

And what's to stop the above from occurring? Nothing.
Click to expand...
Sadly, the path has already been planned out by Vought and the groundwork laid.

You know the fix is in when Republicans do NOT want mail-in ballots (and they usually win the overseas Armed Forces mail-in votes hands down) but DO want to rely on the new voting machines THEY NOW CONTROL!

Someone has already testified they can DIRECT VOTES using the computer code that runs the machines, even if the “printout” you see for your own individual vote looks correct!

Musk didn’t spend 1/4 Billion dollars on Trump’s election to have there be any doubts about the outcome!
 
BlueMoonAcrossThePond said:
I fear that we probably won't have a fair election in 2026 - Republican candidates who lose their election can challenge election results on the grounds of irregularities. In the House, this would occur according to the Federal Contested Election Act (FCEA) of 1969. Similar provisions exist in the Senate.

At the State level, Republican-controlled States might well refuse to certify election results that don't go their way.

And what's to stop the above from occurring? Nothing.
Click to expand...
Probably?
 
Vic said:
That will apply to most government departments.
Click to expand...
In Chicago, they are advertising for Chicago Cops to switch allegiances and go over the DHS/ICE, get better pay and benefits, plus a $50,000 bonus payment for joining.

Why get sued for your actions as a Chicago cop when you can wear a mask, no name tags, and travel in unmarked cars doing all the head cracking you’ve wanted to do for years against anyone of color…ALL with the President’s approval?!

The Fascism is real and completely overt.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top