US Politics Thread

Projection much? Leftist are the ones who've always called anyone who didn't tow their ever changing lines as RWNJs. Just like you have done in the 2 prior posts above.

Anyway, i guess this is your new framing. You as part of the "sane and rational" people seeking common sense compromise of course. And on the other side, the insane MAGA who only care about extremist rhetoric. How quaint.

Again this is a false frame. MAGA is not the reason why every State in the country shifted Right. Those are your fellow "sane and rational" folks who are not satisfied with the present reality.

MAGA is NOT the reason 10 blue Counties in your State of California turned red. It's not the reason the AG of your State got bounced by an independent. It's not the reason why the Mayor of your own City got bounced. It's not the reason why your State voted to re-felonize shoplifting.

You can continue fantasizing about Extremist RWNJs and their stupidity. But it won't change what's happening in your backyard. And everyday people with common sense will react as they see fit. Regardless of what fantasy Foggy and his high society friends are currently entertaining.
I voted FOR the change in the re-felonization.

You voted FOR a felon.

Do you see the difference?

You don’t.

There’s your problem.

But hey — the side you adopted out of Stockholm Syndrome and abject desperation to be accepted by someone is in control now.

We know exactly who to blame if it gets all fucked up.
 
I voted FOR the change in the re-felonization.

You voted FOR a felon.

Do you see the difference?

You don’t.

There’s your problem.

But hey — the side you adopted out of Stockholm Syndrome and abject desperation to be accepted by someone is in control now.

We know exactly who to blame if it gets all fucked up.
I'm sorry to butt in here, but I see parallels with the approach we had here in the UK, with regards to the Brexit vote/fall out.

I voted Remain, and really could not believe what we had done, for even years after. I thought every "Brexiteer" was an absolute fuckwit. I truly hated what they had done. Wouldn't listen to anything they had to say. Still don't, to some extent.

Yet I now realise that calling them deluded fuckwits didn't/doesn't help.
They had an opinion that wasn't totally mine, but they had points that needed addressing.

Nobody has all the answers to everything, despite which side they take.
And sometimes you need to look at your own argument and be big enough to recognise why and how that fell down.
It certainly wasn't because Kamala was a black woman, or because Trump promised peanut butter or egg price reductions ;-)
 
I'm sorry to butt in here, but I see parallels with the approach we had here in the UK, with regards to the Brexit vote/fall out.

I voted Remain, and really could not believe what we had done, for even years after. I thought every "Brexiteer" was an absolute fuckwit. I truly hated what they had done. Wouldn't listen to anything they had to say. Still don't, to some extent.

Yet I now realise that calling them deluded fuckwits didn't/doesn't help.
They had an opinion that wasn't totally mine, but they had points that needed addressing.

Nobody has all the answers to everything, despite which side they take.
And sometimes you need to look at your own argument and be big enough to recognise why and how that fell down.
It certainly wasn't because Kamala was a black woman, or because Trump promised peanut butter or egg price reductions ;-)
What, exactly, is the argument for voting for a felon for US President . . . and then trusting what he has to say?

I guess it's that the problems seem so big we'll turn to anyone who claims they can fix them. Even Trump.

Ok then. He better.

Thing is -- if he doesn't, those who voted for him will never, ever, ever come here and say they were wrong. They'll just turn to the next -- probably worse -- person in line.

The biggest supporter here won't even say one word wrong about Matt Gaetz. Just ignores it. Pretends it never happened.

Who can trust them to make a good choice about anything?
 
What, exactly, is the argument for voting for a felon for US President . . . and then trusting what he has to say?

I guess it's that the problems seem so big we'll turn to anyone who claims they can fix them. Even Trump.

Ok then. He better.

Thing is -- if he doesn't, those who voted for him will never, ever, ever come here and say they were wrong. They'll just turn to the next -- probably worse -- person in line.

The biggest supporter here won't even say one word wrong about Matt Gaetz. Just ignores it. Pretends it never happened.

Who can trust them to make a good choice about anything?

All I'm seeing, from thousands of miles away (and completely neutral) is that a felon beat your candidate.

Let that sink in....a felon (although I know you get that).

Why?

You can say that is because of "dumbing down" or whatever (and I'm not disagreeing) but the point remains that fighting dirtier won't address it. It remains with the Dems to get their shit together and actually "speak" to the electorate.
To give them something other than celeb endorsements, "aspirational" nice words and phrases and actually find their real voice again.
 
All I'm seeing, from thousands of miles away (and completely neutral) is that a felon beat your candidate.

Let that sink in....a felon (although I know you get that).

Why?

You can say that is because of "dumbing down" or whatever (and I'm not disagreeing) but the point remains that fighting dirtier won't address it. It remains with the Dems to get their shit together and actually "speak" to the electorate.
To give them something other than celeb endorsements, "aspirational" nice words and phrases and actually find their real voice again.
I realiz(s)e you are trying to be rational.

Let me give you an example from my own life.

25 years ago I ran a business selling big ticket retail items that typically required financing. My competitor next door selling similar product was actually falsifying W2s to get their customers financed. Moreover the same banks who turned down customers I sent approved the loans from our competitor KNOWING the W2s were forged because they'd already seen and turned down the customers based on their real W2s. It should be no surprise that Deutsche Bank was one of them but not the only one.

So I quit. I closed our store, and walked away.

Thank god, because a year or so later, the whole industry blew up, product shipments fell 80%, have never recovered and many of the banks involved were sued, disappeared, got out of the business, etc. Sales are today about 30% of what they were at the peak.

At the time, customers just wanted the product. Breaking the law didn't matter to them. My competitor just wanted the sale. Breaking the law didn't matter to him.

But what should I have done? Come up with a better way to "speak" to my customers, eh?

Hopefully this example is illustrative.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry to butt in here, but I see parallels with the approach we had here in the UK, with regards to the Brexit vote/fall out.

I voted Remain, and really could not believe what we had done, for even years after. I thought every "Brexiteer" was an absolute fuckwit. I truly hated what they had done. Wouldn't listen to anything they had to say. Still don't, to some extent.

Yet I now realise that calling them deluded fuckwits didn't/doesn't help.
They had an opinion that wasn't totally mine, but they had points that needed addressing.

Nobody has all the answers to everything, despite which side they take.
And sometimes you need to look at your own argument and be big enough to recognise why and how that fell down.
It certainly wasn't because Kamala was a black woman, or because Trump promised peanut butter or egg price reductions ;-)
That’s a great post.
 
Awesome again.

WHO SPECIFICALLY?

It's not rocket science when you don't put up a name or names.

Anyone other than Harris or Biden.
I bet any decent Dem would have had a better chance.

You are going to tell me it was all about the money, aren't you. That prohibited a decent alternative. Bloody sad state of affairs if so...the greatest "democracy" in the world dictated to by the amount a party/nominee has? And how much that money influences who can run?

Quite shocking really.

Anyway, I'll leave you to it. To what I posted originally; don't ignore or belittle what the opposition has to say. Sometimes there is some truth in it.
 
I realiz(s)e you are trying to be rational.

Let me give you an example from my own life.

25 years ago I ran a business selling big ticket retail items that typically required financing. My competitor next door selling similar product was actually falsifying W2s to get their customers financed. Moreover the same banks who turned down customers I sent approved the loans from our competitor KNOWING the W2s were forged because they'd already seen and turned down the customers based on their real W2s. It should be no surprise that Deutsche Bank was one of them but not the only one.

So I quit. I closed our store, and walked away.

Thank god, because a year or so later, the whole industry blew up, product shipments fell 80%, have ever recovered and many of the banks involved were sued, disappeared, got out of the business, etc. Sales are today about 30% of what they were at the peak.

At the time, customers just wanted the product. Breaking the law didn't matter to them. My competitor just wanted the sale. Breaking the law didn't matter to him.

But what should I have done? Come up with a better way to "speak" to my customers, eh?

Hopefully this example is illustrative.

That's pretty awful to be fair.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.