US Politics Thread

[mat]

needs to happen as look what the backwater cousin fucking slave wanting Bible Belt states are already doing:



Seeing as IVF clinics dispose of 1.7m foetuses every year (compared with 650k aborted foetuses), where would that law leave IVF clinics?

The Taliban will be looking at that and thinking fuck me we need to up our game against these crazy bastards.

 

[SWP's back]

The Taliban will be looking at that and thinking fuck me we need to up our game against these crazy bastards.

Also means every single miscarry will be investigated as a potential homicide. Can you fucking imagine.

 

[mat]

Absolute madness

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Also means every single miscarry will be investigated as a potential homicide. Can you fucking imagine.

What if a pregnant woman shoots herself in her stomach? Is it murder?

What if she falls over and kills her unborn child by accident? Is that manslaughter?

What if she doesn’t know she’s pregnant and kills her unborn child by accident?

It’s fucking crackers that any of these scenarios need thinking about.

 

[SWP's back]

Both parties are the same though…

 

[idahoblues]

Both parties are the same though…

Mmmmmm, no

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Lol. This is absurd

Nope they don't believe that.


Nope. No one believes that.


Yes. Some believe this. Especially when evidence sometimes show a flimsy correlation between some of those mandates and positive outcomes.

Mask mandates after vaccination... Anyone explain this please????


Popular vote is irrelevant to deciding the American Presidential election. Let me repeat that again: Popular vote is irrelevant to deciding the American Presidential elections!

There are legitimate reasons for this. And even if there weren't. It's not as if the rules got sprung on any candidates after the fact. Everyone knows the rules going in.

People who make this silly point ( Mostly bretherens from across the pond) have no idea how silly they sound. Let me help:

You sound like someone who complains that his team should be awarded victory because they create more chances than the opposition. Even if the opposition scored more goals.

That is how silly it sounds. The goal of football is to score the most goals. It's irrelevant who created the most chances.

Similarly,the goal of the American Presidential election is to win the most electoral seats. That's the goal! Not the most people votes.That would be the equivalent of having the most possession or most chances created. Irrelevant as far as winning is concerned.

Hope that helps clear things up for all Eternity.


Do you have something against Islam? You think a man or woman shouldn't be able to get on their knees and bow to face Mecca at Sunset? What do you have against Islamic call to prayer exactly?

Oh wait! It's Christianity that you were attempting to flex on. This is typical virtue signaling.


Yes. You've always had that right. And if you doubt that we can test it out now. I'm in serious need. Do you mind sending me 1000 pounds? Let me know where to send my a/c info. Or perhaps you have the right to refuse?

Government on the other hand are shitty at helping. And it by and large becomes an opportunity for corrupt Ill begotten gains. Have you not been reading about the PPP loans and all the scams that came with it?


Yes. Not unfettered. But within the already prescribed limits.

But the real issue here is about power.

Who gets to decide what speech is to the detriment of society? You? The newly formed Ministry of Disinformation in the Biden Orwellian nightmare? Me? Foggy. Dumb SWP?

Pray tell, was the Hunter Biden disinformation free of factual content? How about the lab leak theory? Both were basis for bans and suspension on Social media in the very near past. Today, they are deemed factual.

The reason why Free Speech is necessary, is because we often cannot pre determine which speech is true, right or for the betterment of humanity.

You have to think these things beyond slogans.


Yes, you should not have a right to abortion, just like you should not have a right to kill another person.

Yes, there are circumstances where that right will be yours. In self defense, you can kill another. To preserve your life, you may end that of another.

But that right should be constrained by circumstance. To suggest otherwise is barbaric and frankly, well... Toxic!

I may shift my allegiance to Chelsea after reading these last few posts.

The rest of you can have him.

 

[SWP's back]

I may shift my allegiance to Chelsea after reading these last few posts.

The rest of you can have him.

Be easier if plastic cunts like him moved to support Madrid and we keep the posters than aren’t complete mouth breathing gusset-scrapes.

 

[yankblue]

Both parties are the same though…

'Pro-life' all the way until it costs them a cent or the slightest inconvenience

 

[west didsblue]

'Pro-life' all the way until it costs them a cent or the slightest inconvenience

Or until it’s time to execute them for taking the morning after pill.