BlueMoonAcrossThePond
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2020
- Messages
- 5,956
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Interesting take on the corrosive impact of social media on American society.
I agree with most of Jonathan Haidt's points, but disagree with his view that social media need not be regulated per se, but rather that the algorithms which lead to sensational posts becoming viral needs to change.
For starters, isn't this algorithmic change of necessity going to come about by regulation? - social media companies are out to make money - they won't change this on their own.
Secondly, it's not just sensational posts that are the problem - at all. Rather, it's the spread of disinformation as I've posted numerous times above. If one can view non-factual posts in support of ones views and such posts are completely unregulated - no warning at all as to veracity or in extreme cases removal of posts - then viewers of such content are never, ever, ever going to change their minds. Content regulation is a key to informing voters of what is fact.
I agree with most of Jonathan Haidt's points, but disagree with his view that social media need not be regulated per se, but rather that the algorithms which lead to sensational posts becoming viral needs to change.
For starters, isn't this algorithmic change of necessity going to come about by regulation? - social media companies are out to make money - they won't change this on their own.
Secondly, it's not just sensational posts that are the problem - at all. Rather, it's the spread of disinformation as I've posted numerous times above. If one can view non-factual posts in support of ones views and such posts are completely unregulated - no warning at all as to veracity or in extreme cases removal of posts - then viewers of such content are never, ever, ever going to change their minds. Content regulation is a key to informing voters of what is fact.