US Politics Thread

mat said:
Oops.

Also there's a "major" supreme court decision expected shortly. I'm not saying Rowe v Wade but I'm sure a political judgement like that would push the committee down the news agenda.
Click to expand...
Amazing that the Judiciary was conceived as an apolitical entity, and yet it's never been more political than it is today.

Clarence Thomas is well overdue being sanctioned for his refusal to recuse himself from deliberating on anything to do with Jan 6 after his wife was pushing the stolen election agenda heavily and trying to get electors to submit 'alternative' slates to the Electoral College in the weeks leading up to the attack on the Capitol building.
 
Trevor Morley's Tache said:
Amazing that the Judiciary was conceived as an apolitical entity, and yet it's never been more political than it is today.

Clarence Thomas is well overdue being sanctioned for his refusal to recuse himself from deliberating on anything to do with Jan 6 after his wife was pushing the stolen election agenda heavily and trying to get electors to submit 'alternative' slates to the Electoral College in the weeks leading up to the attack on the Capitol building.
Click to expand...

The crazy thing about Clarence Thomas is not that he was the only justice who voted against the January 6 comittee getting the information that outed Ginny Thomas.

It's that he knew he would be the only dissenting vote, and would lose, and yet he still voted to try and cover it up, implicating himself.

It's just a brazen display of arrogance that he knows nothing will happen to him for breaking every ethical code.
 
FogBlueInSanFran said:
Oh. Can you explain specifically how it’s wrong?
Click to expand...
Our contention was on whether Trump should have been impeached on the basis of his phone call with Ukraine. I didn't think so. You did.

But you then went further and made a multitude of claims that came down to how horrible of a person Trump was. To which I pointed out, that those too weren't legitimate basis for impeachment.

Thinking Trump is an unscrupulous person isn't news to anyone. It's just not a basis for impeachment. That was always the contention.
 
Dax777 said:
Our contention was on whether Trump should have been impeached on the basis of his phone call with Ukraine. I didn't think so. You did.

But you then went further and made a multitude of claims that came down to how horrible of a person Trump was. To which I pointed out, that those too weren't legitimate basis for impeachment.

Thinking Trump is an unscrupulous person isn't news to anyone. It's just not a basis for impeachment. That was always the contention.
Click to expand...
You. Voted. For. Jorgensen. That is the topic at hand. Not impeachment. You knew by not giving Biden your vote, Trump would be more likely to win. Even if you were confident he wouldn’t, you couldn’t have been sure. And you did it anyway. You misjudged the threat he posed that so many of us saw. Or you ignored it. Or you saw it, but were too afraid to pull the lever for Biden for reasons I can only speculate about. It’s one of the three. I just want to know which one.
 
DontLookBackInAnger said:
I lived in the US for a number of years and was married to an elementary school, anyway monthly they would have active shooter dills..... By state law they only had to do one fire drill every twelve months
Click to expand...

You were married to a whole elementary school? I mean I know some states seem to have a more "flexible" view on the legal age to marry but mate you were taking it a bit far weren't you? lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.