US Politics Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
You want sick? Try the Bible:

(Deuteronomy 20:10-14)

As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.”


Nothing like a bit of slavery, Murder and rape to scare the kids eh.

Again I am not religious in any way you could point at many things couldn't you?
 
You've read it then, or did you just listen to the carefully selected reading by Senator Kennedy?

You don't believe what he read is pornographic? It doesn't matter if the rest of the book is about picking daisies.

It's banned for a reason.

 
You don't believe what he read is pornographic? It doesn't matter if the rest of the book is about picking daisies.

It's banned for a reason.

Do you actually understand how those books make it onto the 'banned' list?

In 1982, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a noncommittal ruling. In Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico (1982), the Court deemed that “local school boards have broad discretion in the management of school affairs” and that discretion “must be exercised in a manner that comports with the transcendent imperatives of the First Amendment.” In essence, a single school board member, unqualified in the field of education can propose that a book be banned because they personally 'find it offensive'.

Given that all those school districts quoted on the Marshal Libraries list for that particular publication are deep red/ultra-conservative in terms of their politics (and largely religious, aka hypocrites) you don't think that might be why it is banned?

Edit: I'll just add that the Supreme Court at that time (1982) was a 10:2 Republican nominated majority.
 
Last edited:
You don't believe what he read is pornographic? It doesn't matter if the rest of the book is about picking daisies.

It's banned for a reason.

No, as I'm aware of the context, it is a quote from a piece of literature, a memoir from a respected author/journalist, and not a quote from Debbie Does Dallas.

There is a difference between literature and pornography.

I'm going to make a presumption from our interactions on this topic, that you believe any description of a sexual act is pornographic and books that contain any reference to a sexual act should be banned from High Schools?
 
No, as I'm aware of the context, it is a quote from a piece of literature, a memoir from a respected author/journalist, and not a quote from Debbie Does Dallas.

There is a difference between literature and pornography.

I'm going to make a presumption from our interactions on this topic, that you believe any description of a sexual act is pornographic and books that contain any reference to a sexual act should be banned from High Schools?
Presumably, this is also pornographic?

 
You don't believe what he read is pornographic? It doesn't matter if the rest of the book is about picking daisies.
Without wading into the fray very deeply having no familiarity with the book as a whole but having read this thread and taking everyone’s comments as truthful and at face value . . . I’d actually say it matters a lot.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top