US Politics Thread

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

Dax IS the right! He's not an outlier, mate. There are way, way, way more Daxes than there are "persuadable" Trump supporters. As he continues to suggest.

Ignore the Dax :-)

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Might as well then look into Canadian citizenship.

For me, the status quo isn't great at all - but it's not irrecoverable. Step one is to face facts; step two is to design a strategy to persuade those on the Right.

At the same time, a crashing economy will spell doom for MAGA no matter what - IMO - such is the force of that factor. On the flip side, if the economy - meaning the price of gas and that of a loaf of bread and not the stock market, or job index or whatever - if the economy in these terms is great - there's likely very little we can do to change vote outcomes.

I think that the sweet spot is if the economy is so-so in two/four/six years. In that case, it's vital to persuade the persuadable. The "I give up there's nothing we can do" mentality ceeds this possibility to the Right.

If Project 2025 is allowed a free run, the election just gone might very well be the last.

Sow discord,
Ramp up the rhetoric,
Crash the economy,
Blame it on 'them' (Dem's/migrants/bloody foreigners; whoever),
Turn up the heat, and when the people 'push back'
Invoke Marshal Law and install a dictator, and at that point, it's over.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

If Project 2025 is allowed a free run, the election just gone might very well be the last.

Sow discord,
Ramp up the rhetoric,
Crash the economy,
Blame it on 'them' (Dem's/migrants/bloody foreigners; whoever),
Turn up the heat, and when the people 'push back'
Invoke Marshal Law and install a dictator, and at that point, it's over.

Can't argue with that. But it's not a foregone conclusion that 2025 will go into full effect.

If the Project 2025 blueprint doesn't come to full fruition and elections still matter in 2/4/6 years - and yet Democrats and Left-leaning/Centrist voters give up entirely - or fail to appeal to the persuadable - then we've given up on the real possibility to change things for the better.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Can't argue with that. But it's not a foregone conclusion that 2025 will go into full effect.

If the Project 2025 blueprint doesn't come to full fruition and elections still matter in 2/4/6 years - and yet Democrats and Left-leaning/Centrist voters give up entirely - or fail to appeal to the persuadable - then we've given up on the real possibility to change things for the better.

It's going to require a Herculean effort given that R's are going to pack the courts at every level

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

It's going to require a Herculean effort given that R's are going to pack the courts at every level

Nothing worthwhile comes easy :-)

Point is, not to give up.

 

[babyape]

Ignore the Dax :-)

Daxit ;)

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Nothing worthwhile comes easy :-)

Point is, not to give up.

Haven't even talked about how the "election was rigged" story will play out next time around.

 

[Trevor Morley's Tache]

Haven't even talked about how the "election was rigged" story will play out next time around.

Not only that. There is absolutely nothing to stop Right wing billionaires buying up left-leaning media outlets and making them sing and dance to a different tune.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/25/media/elon-musk-msnbc-spinoff-cable/index.html

Also, the same RW billionaires control online platforms like Twitter, where they can control what we see, or who sees what we post.

Left leaning voices will become marginalised and eventually strangled.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

The amazing ignorance is widespread. Blame the dems for a poor campaign. They didn’t actually warn anybody.

Let's unpack this for a moment.

The simplistic viewpoint which most Trump voters believe is that China pays for tariffs.

Whereas, in fact, American importers of Chinese goods pay for tariffs.

Which, IMO, is a distinction without a difference. There's zero difference between China itself paying the import tax versus importers paying the tax.
===
As a simplistic political ploy - of course you'll proclaim that China is paying the import tax.

As a matter-of-fact consequence on America's economy - it doesn't matter at all who pays the tariffs.
===
What ultimately matters - is free market economics. Is the American consumer going to benefit from tariffs or not. And, is the American economy - due to new job creation - going to benefit from tariffs?

It's not clear to me how this pans out - chiefly b/c China is cheating - subsidizing its companies in an effort to drive out competition.

What is absolutely clear though - imposing tariffs against Chinese imports - regardless of who pays the tariffs will both simultaneously increase the cost of goods to the American consumer - and - if tariffs are high enough - encourage domestic production of goods - possibly, even to the extent, that said production starts up to the detriment of consumers but to the possible benefit of American workers who take the newly created jobs.
===
TL/DR
Tariffs are a complex issue.

IMO, no tariffs whatsoever leads to the most "efficient" economy assuming fair play. Yet, as Adam Smith observed - markets need regulation.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

Haven't even talked about how the "election was rigged" story will play out next time around

Please elaborate - I think I know what you mean - but I hesitate to jump to conclusions.