US Politics Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
I posted about a couple of polls yesterday that showed Democrats with their lowest approval since 1990.

For instance - A CNN/SSRS survey released Sunday found only 29% of those polled viewed Democrats in a favorable light. Fifty-four percent said they viewed the Democratic Party unfavorably.

A Separate poll also released on Sunday by NBC News showed only 27% of registered voters view Democrats favorably, and a mere 7% view Democrats “very” positively. Fifty-five percent viewed Democrats in an unfavorable light.

There's more -


**77% of Democratic voters polled felt their party was not doing enough to oppose President Donald Trump.**

Sixty-five percent of them said they would be happy to see their elected officials fail as long as they stayed true to their principles and nothing was accomplished.

Need somebody in the US to answer @ChicagoBlue maybe, but is the losing US party necessarily expected to play the role of the opposition?
In UK there is an official opposition, whether they're f'ing useless or not.
 
In general the party that doesn't hold the presidency will try to trip up the party that does, but we don't have an opposition party in the sense the UK does, with shadow ministers and things like that. There's no need to form a government in the US system so it's uncommon that you have one party holding all the power. Most of the complaints aimed at Democrats since the transfer of power are from people who want them to be more oppositional given the circumstances, ie the GOP holding almost all the power.
 
I posted about a couple of polls yesterday that showed Democrats with their lowest approval since 1990.

For instance - A CNN/SSRS survey released Sunday found only 29% of those polled viewed Democrats in a favorable light. Fifty-four percent said they viewed the Democratic Party unfavorably.

A Separate poll also released on Sunday by NBC News showed only 27% of registered voters view Democrats favorably, and a mere 7% view Democrats “very” positively. Fifty-five percent viewed Democrats in an unfavorable light.

There's more -


**77% of Democratic voters polled felt their party was not doing enough to oppose President Donald Trump.**

Sixty-five percent of them said they would be happy to see their elected officials fail as long as they stayed true to their principles and nothing was accomplished.


Not entirely sure what you expect the Democrats to do. They field competent candidates, try and enact policies intended to benefit people and respect the constitution.

American voters however prefer batshit lunacy, wiping their arse - sorry ass - on the US constitution and invading Canada. The Democrats are not going to offer any of the aforementioned lunacy, arse wiping and Canadian invasion, so they might as well put their feet up and let the Republicans get on with it.
 
Not entirely sure what you expect the Democrats to do. They field competent candidates, try and enact policies intended to benefit people and respect the constitution.

American voters however prefer batshit lunacy, wiping their arse - sorry ass - on the US constitution and invading Canada. The Democrats are not going to offer any of the aforementioned lunacy, arse wiping and Canadian invasion, so they might as well put their feet up and let the Republicans get on with it.
Demonstrate. Demonstrate.
Huge demo planned for April 4th. The Maga loonies need a shock.
 
Demonstrate. Demonstrate.
Huge demo planned for April 4th. The Maga loonies need a shock.
Not going to do any good until those that voted for Trump start participating in rallies against him.

As I keep saying — we have a Trump voter who frequents this thread. Address questions to him if you want to know what would get him to change his mind. He’s formerly worked on Obama’s campaign and voted 3rd party in 2020; he called Trump “an idiot all of the time” (but still voted for him). As such you know he’s not a true cultist or a complete imbecile. So ask him what it would take to change his mind rather than presuming Democrats have to do something.
 


Schumer defending his appeasement of Trump. I understand his argument and fair play to Hayes picking it apart.

I never really got on with Hayes when I first watched him, but I've warmed to him. He's a very skilled interviewer and incredibly knowledgeable and articulate, if not a little excitable at times.

Shumer has made the ultimate error in appeasing Trump and is now doubling down on it. He's pretty much done for.
 
Not going to do any good until those that voted for Trump start participating in rallies against him.

As I keep saying — we have a Trump voter who frequents this thread. Address questions to him if you want to know what would get him to change his mind. He’s formerly worked on Obama’s campaign and voted 3rd party in 2020; he called Trump “an idiot all of the time” (but still voted for him). As such you know he’s not a true cultist or a complete imbecile. So ask him what it would take to change his mind rather than presuming Democrats have to do something.
Nah. I’ll pass, thanks.
 
in the UK we don't get Fox News so all I get to see of Watters is on-line clips where he comes across as an infantile, moaning ignoramous more concerned with his looks than his intelligence - typical Republican supporting TV presnter it seems to me.

 
Not entirely sure what you expect the Democrats to do. They field competent candidates,
Lie
try and enact policies intended to benefit people
Semi lie. As 'intended' is doing a lot of heavy lifting here
and respect the constitution.
Lol. You wish

American voters however prefer batshit lunacy, wiping their arse - sorry ass - on the US constitution and invading Canada. The Democrats are not going to offer any of the aforementioned lunacy, arse wiping and Canadian invasion, so they might as well put their feet up and let the Republicans get on with it.
Lol. More derangement.
 

Justice department removes disability guidelines for US businesses​



The Department of Justice removed 11 guidelines for US businesses on compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), including some that deal with Covid-19 and masking and accessibility.

The ADA was signed into law in 1990 and is the key civil rights law that protects Americans with disabilities from discrimination.

Updates have already been made to the ADA.gov website to reflect the removal of the guidances. Multiple pages were removed from the ADA's archive website, including one page that explained how retail businesses are required to have accessible features and another on customer service practices for hotel and lodging guests with disabilities.

In a webpage titled "Covid-19 and the Americans with Disabilities Act", the justice department removed five out of seven questions that were listed on the page as recently as recently as early March.

The removed guidances include questions about whether the justice department issues exemptions for mask requirements and resources to help explain an employee with a disability's rights to an employer during the Covid-19 pandemic.

In a press release, the justice department called the guidance "unnecessary and outdated".

"Avoiding confusion and reducing the time spent understanding compliance may allow businesses to deliver price relief to consumers," the press release said.

The justice department said it will highlight tax incentives that will help businesses cover the costs of making accessibility improvements for customers and employees.

The department referred to a 20 January executive orderas the reason why it was removing the ADA guidelines.

In the executive order, Donald Trump pointed vaguely at government regulation as the reason behind inflation. The White House said the Biden administration "made necessary goods and services scarce through a crushing regulatory burden and radical policies designed to weaken American production".

"Unprecedented regulatory oppression from the Biden administration is estimated to have imposed almost $50,000 in costs on the average American household," the White House claimed in the executive order.

At the time, the order did not specify what regulations the Trump administration would remove but directed agencies to evaluate business regulations.

"Putting money back into the pockets of business owners helps everyone by allowing those businesses to pass on cost savings to consumers and bolster the economy," said the acting US assistant attorney general Mac Warner in a statement.

This isn't the first time Republicans have tried to curb the ADA for the sake of making it easier on businesses. In 2017, Republicans in Congress introduced a bill that would have made it harder for Americans with disabilities to bring lawsuits against businesses and employers.
 
in the UK we don't get Fox News so all I get to see of Watters is on-line clips where he comes across as an infantile, moaning ignoramous more concerned with his looks than his intelligence - typical Republican supporting TV presnter it seems to me.


Republicans are generally cunts. The ones on TV are a special breed though.
 
in the UK we don't get Fox News so all I get to see of Watters is on-line clips where he comes across as an infantile, moaning ignoramous more concerned with his looks than his intelligence - typical Republican supporting TV presnter it seems to me.


Watters is a weapons-grade bellend.

I'd be surprised if his own family liked him.
 
in the UK we don't get Fox News so all I get to see of Watters is on-line clips where he comes across as an infantile, moaning ignoramous more concerned with his looks than his intelligence - typical Republican supporting TV presnter it seems to me.


Can we get some more tips about masculinity from the man wearing makeup?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top