super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 47,691
Nope. There is ONE thing surely learned from this?Michelle.
Nope. There is ONE thing surely learned from this?Michelle.
No. Probably not Michelle. Smart of her not to run. Barrack would have had a slight chance. But hed have been running against an economic, immigration and cultural headwind.Michelle.
WW2 probably never ended to be fair.WW3 started with 9/11.
Has there been any reason given for the vote turnout?
Currently:
81m-74m last time (wikipedia)
66-71 so far this time (from Google).
True. "Michelle" was a forlorn comment. But at least she wouldn't have had the weight of being Biden's VP round her neck. And she IS a far better speaker.No. Probably not Michelle. Smart of her not to run. Barrack would have had a slight chance. But hed have been running against an economic, immigration and cultural headwind.
As much as it was ignored here, the Issues were always 4 - 1.in favor of Trump.
Economy, Immigration, incumbency and foreign Policy were all pro Trump. And Abortion was Pro Harris.
She was always going up against a headwind. And she was probably the worst public speaker since Walter Mondale.
A Harris win would have been the greatest surprise.
Trump win highly likely
Trump Landslide less likely
Harris win possible but not likely.
Harris landslide was just not on the cards.
This was the problem with the Harris campaign. They only spoke about Trump. Just like everyone left leaning.