US Presidential Election, Nov 5th 2024

Seem defence of what? did any of my post defending Trump in anyway? Of course not he is horrible person and i agree with that.

Anyway even if i hate his gut and the way he handle his first term presidency. He is not actually trigger anything that most people feared is ie Nuclear Armageddon when he become president the first time hasn't he?

That's the only small hope that calm my mind that there will be no Nuclear Wars atleast when Trump in charge second time.

Yeah America is fucked when he in charge again but atleast there's no drastic thing like Nuclear War atleast.
It was a general comment made after reading several pieces over the last few days, not necessarily aimed at you.
 
Listening to the podcast The rest is politics and Trump hasn’t a clue about anything like tariffs etc and been explained about the Middle East from Lawrence of Arabia just about sums the fucker up. It’s going to a bumpy ride for 4 years and the Democrats need to sort their shit out or it could continue for a long time.
 
Seem defence of what? did any of my post defending Trump in anyway? Of course not he is horrible person and i agree with that.

Anyway even if i hate his gut and the way he handle his first term presidency. He is not actually trigger anything that most people feared is ie Nuclear Armageddon when he become president the first time hasn't he?

That's the only small hope that calm my mind that there will be no Nuclear Wars atleast when Trump in charge second time.

Yeah America is fucked when he in charge again but atleast there's no drastic thing like Nuclear War atleast.
That’s a fairly low bar to him being acceptable - he didn’t start WW3 last time so he might not this time. Fantastic.
 
Listening to the podcast The rest is politics and Trump hasn’t a clue about anything like tariffs etc and been explained about the Middle East from Lawrence of Arabia just about sums the fucker up. It’s going to a bumpy ride for 4 years and the Democrats need to sort their shit out or it could continue for a long time.
I thought one of them made a fantastic point the the GOP have been planning this shit since the tea party days and have plans of attacks and fallbacks. Whilst the Dems look at 2 yearly cycles which is now biting them on the arse.
 
That’s a fairly low bar to him being acceptable - he didn’t start WW3 last time so he might not this time. Fantastic.

Again being seen again defending Trump, even it's not the point my post at all.

You know what, most of you especially American people that support Democrat still deeply hurt by this election so it best i don't bother you guys on this thread.
 
Thanks for your honesty here Dax.

A few things I'd push back on though:

You can summarise it further in that Trump is transactional, any deal done is far more likely to be for his financial benefit as opposed to the benefit of the US, its allies, and the world as a whole.
Of what personal financial benefit was brokering the Middle Eastern Accords? Or trying to lower hostilities with N. Korea?

There is more money to be made in entering and prosecuting wars. So if personal financial benefits were his goal, he is certainly going about it the wrongeat of ways.

I think this is a case of superimposing ones feeling about Trump the man unto his actions.

Is it not the Republican party doing their best to subvert the vote of Americans? The party that also promoted conspiracy theories about voter fraud and unfounded claims that the Democrats would cheat?
I think left to their own devices both parties have enough unscrupulous actors who'd attempt to do corrupt things. We've always had evidence of this and there are even some in this cycle.

The prosecutions and reports in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Arizona or the Bucks county case of elections official "incorrectly" closing polling places early.

But that neither here nor there. I was referring to the attempts to remove a party's candidate from the ballot box entirely.

Something that officials in many States attempted against Trump, Jill Stein, and RFK in this election.

And other external attempts to cripple Trump, specifically because he was the opposition. I find these to be actual threats to democracy

Wasn't Trump if not outrightly saying it, then heavily implying that his political opponents are the enemy and they belong in jail/dead, or any media that criticise him should be cancelled/taken off air?
Again, this is just framing. I have harshed this out before many times and don't want to do so again. Granted probably not with you.

But here is the video



Watch it and whatever conclusion you draw, I am happy to accept and agree to disagree.
I know your feelings about Jan 6th, so I wont go over that. The first impeachment was not a 'trumped up' charge, he tried to extort a foreign government for his own political benefit and he was backed by a heavily partisan Senate.
I had this debate too many times in the past. Let's agree to disagree. I'm sure I won't convince you.

As for Stormy Daniels, he's charged with campaign finance law violations, falsifying business records, tax violations, and conspiracy to commit fraud, all are crimes.
Again, I disagree both on the outcome from a legal standpoint and the manner and purpose of bringing the case.
Are you of the opinion that the President should be immune to the law whilst in office, after office, or even running for office?
No. I'm of the opinion, that laws should not be used as tools to undermine an opponent you fair you can't defeat in an open free and fair election.
When you say 'they tried to kill him' who do you mean by they?
Think I answered this earlier. The 2 potential assassins. And whoever their handlers might have been

I'd caution never say never, but I truly hope you don't ever come to regret it.
Fair point. Let me downgrade. I strongly doubt that I will.
 
I keep seeing the 'democrats need to sort their shit out', honestly, how are they ever getting back in? I'm being deadly serious. He's never going to concede an election, he was on his way to calling cheating this time around until he realised he was winning and he stopped.

Who's going to refuse the orders next time when the results get ordered to be changed as per Georgia? Which VP is going to go against his orders of not following the process of a peaceful transfer of power in the congress? Their only hope I guess, is that the MAGA movement somehow self-combusts where they turn on each other. But for now, they are all firmly in the cult of trump, even if he does call their wives ugly or humiliates anybody within his own party who dares to question him.
 
Listening to the podcast The rest is politics and Trump hasn’t a clue about anything like tariffs etc and been explained about the Middle East from Lawrence of Arabia just about sums the fucker up. It’s going to a bumpy ride for 4 years and the Democrats need to sort their shit out or it could continue for a long time.
Trump now has the problem of the hugely unpopular agenda his followers will want to push.

There are people in his orbit who want to disband the big government agencies. Gut the IRS, FBI, etc etc.... They will want him to release all the Jan 6th prisoners and create a federal abortion ban.

He has to push back against his own people or implement a car crash. Last time round his administration ground to a halt with all the infighting and he mostly golfed his way through the second half.

This time he looks set to put far more hardliners in top positions and with full control of the other houses he can do some radical things. But as soon as the difficulties hit, the leaking starts and the bad coverage he will start blaming and firing them.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.