US Presidential Election, Nov 5th 2024

[BlueHammer85]

If you believe Rogan would do the following;

"Had Harris gone on there, it would have been a big “Bro smack down of the uppity black chick who thinks she can beat Trump!” He would have smacked her around, not let her get away with anything, and had video clip after video clip cued up and ready to go for every trap she walked into!"

Then you haven't watched or you are projecting your beliefs into him. It's nothing like a CNN and Fox interview. It's not about gotchas.

Instead, he allows (most often right wing) discredited guests on to spout conspiracy bollox and lies go unchallenged.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

So that's a no. You sanctimonious midwits are psychologically incapable of examining yourselves. Got it.

I’ve examined myself and found myself gracious in defeat and hoping the new President and the government he controls makes the world a better place.

I’ve also examined myself and decided dumb fucking kumquats go on ignore.

 

[Lee1983]

Men for Harris right about now.

 

[Lee1983]

I’ve examined myself and found myself gracious in defeat and hoping the new President and the government he controls makes the world a better place.

I’ve also examined myself and decided dumb fucking kumquats go on ignore.

Yeah to your safe space. I expect as much. Do you need a paper bag to breathe into?

 

[meltonblue]

View attachment 137902Men for Harris right about now.

Can we please not turn this site into X?

 

[threespires]

@ChicagoBlue I'm curious what your motivations for turning to far left extremism were? I must admit I struggle to envisage both you and @FogBlueInSanFran going to bed at night clutching your limited edition Marx and Engels hot water bottles. I've looked at both my copy of Das Kapital and VI's collected works; but I can't see anything in them that suggests not wanting a President who is a convicted felon, sex offender and serial conman with seemingly a significant personality disorder, would mark you out as liable to join a revolutionary cadre. But maybe you have later editions than me?

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

Yeah to your safe space. I expect as much. Do you need a paper bag to breathe into?

Is somebody talking? I smell something.

 

[FogBlueInSanFran]

@ChicagoBlue I'm curious what your motivations for turning to far left extremism were? I must admit I struggle to envisage both you and @FogBlueInSanFran going to bed at night clutching your limited edition Marx and Engels hot water bottles. I've looked at both my copy of Das Kapital and VI's collected works; but I can't see anything in them that suggests not wanting a President who is a convicted felon, sex offender and serial conman with seemingly a significant personality disorder, would mark you out as liable to join a revolutionary cadre. But maybe you have later editions than me?

Tee hee.

Everybody here who has done business with Donald Trump stand up.

Oh.

I suggest everyone else do some research on doing business with him. I would suggest around 92 percent or so who have would never vote for him. Including nearly all his cabinet.

But what do we know, eh?

 

[west didsblue]

Yeah to your safe space. I expect as much. Do you need a paper bag to breathe into?

You’ve got your preferred convicted felon, adjudicated rapist, probable traitor and suspected pedo into the White House.

I never realised that not being overjoyed about that made people lefties and woke.

Anyway you learn something new every day.

 

[BlueMoonAcrossThePond]

The same Carville who was telling everyone the Democrat’s are not just 99% sure to win the Election. But 100 %. There's nothing more Certain was his phrase.

Carville was wrong (or was simply being a good soldier and conveying an optimistic message) just like everyone else. His points are nonetheless interesting - even if the video is revisionist with regard to his prediction.