US Presidential Race 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
ha - fair enough. And its not so much that i give a shit - not my vote - just kind of...amazed? perplexed? What do people see in this guy and really believe? how? It just seems to come across as a bit '£350 million per week for the NHS!!!! erm, on second thoughts maybe not - but it served a purpose right????' Maybe it is that just he is not a she and that appeals to that part of the whole that likes to hold onto the idea that women are evil and witches? Who knows?
I don't know about the American voters but from my perspective it's because Hilary Clinton is a sex abuser protecting, criminal warmonger. I have since withheld my preference on account of Trump being accused of being accused of paedophilia and being mates with a convicted paedophile. I haven't had time to see the fallout of it and if it's true or lies though.
 
I don't know about the American voters but from my perspective it's because Hilary Clinton is a sex abuser protecting, criminal warmonger. I have since withheld my preference on account of Trump being accused of being accused of paedophilia and being mates with a convicted paedophile. I haven't had time to see the fallout of it and if it's true or lies though.

Thats what I dont get, I get people hating Hillary but for those same people to make out Trump is some kind of saviour, its plain bizarre to me. He's a racist, misogynist, lying, tax dodging, ill informed, cheeto faced, ferret wearing, shitgibbon.
 
Lucky him. Because you can bet your balls that he would have voted for it.
It's great that you know that for a fact.

And before you pull up some random quote from 2003 let me say this:

A member of the public supporting the Iraq war, who had no access to the WMD "dossier", is COMPLETELY different to a politican voting on the matter having complete access to the information available.
 
That's like saying you'd only trust Slur Alex to officiate City's matches because he's unbiased.

Of the two candidates Trump is the one who threatens to use nukes. He's also the one who everybody who was ever in charge of actually launching the missiles has said isn't fit to be POTUS.

Oh and spending over 30 years fighting for women't and children's rights while being knowledgeable about world affairs doesn't equate with spending your entire life suing people and being sued while paying settlements for discriminating against blacks and molesting women.
Maybe your country should look back on it's eagerness to utilise nuclear arms, napalm and the like unnecessarily in the past and look at why the type of people eager to use them get access to them in the first place.
 
Last edited:
A vote for Trump will make slapping shitbag's on trains legal. Thus our Americans cousins will never feel the euphoria blues over here feel from doing the same.
 
Thats what I dont get, I get people hating Hillary but for those same people to make out Trump is some kind of saviour, its plain bizarre to me. He's a racist, misogynist, lying, tax dodging, ill informed, cheeto faced, ferret wearing, shitgibbon.
Only those filled with hatred or idiotic tendencies would believe he is some kind of saviour. Pretty sure anyone on here whose shown support for him realises both candidates are utter cnuts but for all the negatives Trump would bring, he does have some potentially major positives - primarily building relations between the US and Russia (Clinton would bring zero positive change). Clinton on the other hand is as corrupt as they come and it's blatant. Whilst it's naive to trust Trump based on what he's indicating his presidency will bring, it's worth giving him the chance over someone who epitomises the typical lying, topic-dodging politician that is Clinton - as long as he's not a sex offender. Everyone must surely agree that both should be dropped for other candidates however - saying that some of the other candidates (inc. primaries) were/are shit or nutcases too. Showing a preference/support for Trump based on what i've just said is a bit like the debates on Corbyn I've had on here - many acknowledge the positive change they talk of bringing about, but won't support them because they just don't believe they will follow through - yet instead, will still show support for the same ilk of politician that has been dragging us all along while lining their own pockets for donkeys years.
 
It wasn't an exaggeration Karen, I was addressing two points and made an error. Sorry.

The point remains, which no one has addressed is that she has contributed to Libya, Iraq and Syria.

But carry on being as pedantic as possible.
Probably Yemen too, but 'kin 'ell Phil, will you stop sitting on the fence and come out with who you'd prefer to win and why ffs!?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.