US Presidential Race 2016

[@BluePhil8]

Such a shame that you lie and lie and lie. sad.

Try quoting in full next time rather than trying to misrepresent. You've already lost if you have to use deception.

 

[kaz7]

Is there a drunk 15 yr old loose in this thread lol

 

[west didsblue]

Why must you lie? aren't you confident in your convictions?

The bit you've highlighted relates to you spunking yourself. The bit you haven't relates to you getting a hard on thinking about Donald.

 

[@BluePhil8]

So hoping for a Trump win, but can't for the life of me imagine it'll happen.

It's like the shy tory vote, the liberal left attack anyone who disagrees with them so the polls are always skewed.

 

[@BluePhil8]

The bit you've highlighted relates to you spunking yourself. The bit you haven't relates to you getting a hard on thinking about Donald.

No offence but you need to go back to school

 

[@BluePhil8]

Primary school.

Reading comprehension of a feral animal.

 

[@BluePhil8]

Is there a drunk 15 yr old loose in this thread lol

I am drunk but sadly I'm not 15.

 

[west didsblue]

No offence but you need to go back to school

You're not the brightest are you. You don't even understand your own posts.

 

[west didsblue]

I am drunk but sadly I'm not 15.

13?

 

[CitizenTID]

My concern is the propaganda campaign taking place under the guise of being from Wiki. The level of hacking and propaganda in this particular campaign is unprecedented.

Wiki's sources aren't all hacks as you probably know. Your later post about the potential of people forging documents and then leaking them to WikiLeaks (they'd have to verify who the person was, but let's use a Russian Govt. hacker they know and who they believe hacked it reliably) - I don't know what measures they'd have in place to check validity in such circumstances other than retrace the hack and do it themselves to verify (if possible). In most whistleblowing cases due to private servers etc. they must have to trust the source but, with all the accusations of them having links with Russia I'm sure they'd be wary of hacks. They could very possibly have a policy of not publishing hacked documents they can't hack again to verify if from a 3rd party and may only publish first-hand leaks (i.e. someone who works for the organisation with legal possession of the document). As far as I'm aware they haven't revealed that level of detail.

So, the 100% reliable claims can't be proven but what i can say in response to that is that when Clinton was questioned about these leaks in the debates, such looked awkward, never denied their validity and only resorted to accusing Russia of cyber attacks and trying to influence the US election, which actually does the most to verify to the public that they are indeed kosher.