US Presidential Race 2016

[CitizenTID]

There has been nothing in the emails that shows any crime at all. People don't realize that the leaked emails from John Podesta and the DNC are not under government jurisdiction in any way, political parties function the same as clubs and nothing more. If they want to influence the primaries and help one candidate they can do it. Just like if Bluemoon doesn't want to let people ask for links in game threads they can do that too, it's nobody else's business.

Of course Fox News doesn't tell people that because it won't get them their desired result. It's the same as when they reported that there was evidence of the State Department destroying phones with hammers. Now this is 100% true, under Secretary Clinton the State Department absolutely destroyed phones used for official government business with hammers, I'll admit that. They took the phones with government secrets and smashed them with hammers so nobody would ever be able to recover the information on them. This is obviously some evidence that they were trying to hide information and is horrible and everybody who was involved should go to jail.

***Except for the fact that standard State Department protocol requires all old devices used for official business that may contain sensitive information be destroyed.

Now, when Fox News reported about the phones guess which part they didn't mention?????

Not all those deleted emails have been released to the public by one way or the other so you can't say there is nothing incriminating. There is certainly very dodgy stuff that the public should be outraged by that has been released by Wikileaks (if deemed true and not falsified). Whilst Wikileaks publishing what seems like every email they get their hands on allows anyone to look into everything for themselves if they wish, I don't think presenting a barrage of leaks every week has done themselves any favours - the average person doesn't want to wade through all the irrelevant info in there.

I know such measures is the best way to destroy something containing sensitive info but it's what made her delete the emails that is in question. She could have done it as part of decommissioning that private server (i don't know if she has), but it appears it was under mounting pressure on her - she didn't address any of this in the first two debates I watched and I don't know if she has anywhere else.

 

[CitizenTID]

Well, that if it was illegal she would have been charged. Obviously you dont understand that.

That's not a fact. A fact would be, "if she did something illegal she should have been charged by the letter of the law." There's much more at play in this case than an average citizen and I'm sure you would admit that (including timescales, she might yet be charged).

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

That's not a fact. A fact would be, "if she did something illegal she should have been charged by the letter of the law." There's much more at play in this case than an average citizen and I'm sure you would admit that (including timescales, she might yet be charged).

No mate. That is a fact. The investigation said there was nothing illegal. As in, factually.

 

[CitizenTID]

No mate. That is a fact. The investigation said there was nothing illegal. As in, factually.

The investigation last year, which she answered to congress for regarding Benghazi? That was regarding Benghazi alone wasn't it and not about this email fiasco? Is there not still an ongoing FBI investigation that we may or may not know (I doubt they would reveal) involves reinvestigating things that were part of the initial case?

EDIT: Ok, I see your probably referencing something from July of this year from the FBI - I'm sure there is still an ongoing FBI investigation as recent emails have come to light however. Only read the headline of this, but since DailyMail published the above in July, they also published this very recently: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Foundation-case-moves-likely-indictment.html

As indicated in the article, it all looks very political surrounding her case. You would surely agree with me there is a history in the US of criminal cases being squashed because of political matters/defendants' having political friends? Not saying Clinton is guilty here, but at her level and with her husband she has plenty power of influence if she needed.

 

[Ricster]

The man didn't realize that Russia was in Ukraine. He doesn't possess average intelligence let alone the brains to understand the nuances of world affairs. When asked what he would replace our current healthcare system with he said "Something terrific". When asked about how he would change our vetting process for refugees he said "We would keep it the same but do it with higher energy". He has also warned that if Hillary Clinton is elected she'd bring in 650 million immigrants in the first week, our population is currently 320 million. He's also in favor of torture and killing the families of suspected terrorists which is a war crime. If he gives an order like that and the military refuses to obey we could have a Constitutional crisis and possibly a military coup.

As far as deleting emails, grow the fuck up. It was a private fucking server, I get 75 emails every fucking day offering me discounts on everything from sunglasses to cruises and I delete all of them. If you don't think Hillary Clinton gets more bullshit emails than I do then you're stupid. And if you think that she nefariously deleted 30,000 emails because they were all incriminating your mind has been poisoned by Fox News.

There was no hack of her private server and there has been nothing incriminating that has come out in the leaks. People think there have been because they're confused about what Wikileaks has...

Oh for fucks sake, you're too stupid to reason with. It's very simple, I don't think we should risk nuclear annihilation to elect Trump because Hillary Clinton sent emails from a private server. Imagine if the person running against Hitler was far more qualified but people didn't vote for him because he sent some official letters w/ his own address as the return address? Wouldn't it have been better to avoid the fucking Holocaust and not elect Hitler if it meant overlooking the address thing?

You are dodging the whole what Hillary has done and concentrating on what the mainstream media is saying about Trump.

I'm anti both but you are basically saying that banning Muslims is worse than bombing Muslims?

You tell people to stop watching Fox News, but maybe you should stop watching CNN

 

[Don Karleone]

Someone just try to kill Trump?

 

[TFC]

Someone just try to kill Trump?

Be surprised if whoever gets in doesn't have an assasination attempt or two to deal with. Lot of hate, nutters and of course guns over here.

 

[KenTheLandlord]

Someone just try to kill Trump?

No

 

[buckshot]

You are dodging the whole what Hillary has done and concentrating on what the mainstream media is saying about Trump.

I'm anti both but you are basically saying that banning Muslims is worse than bombing Muslims?

You tell people to stop watching Fox News, but maybe you should stop watching CNN

Get over yourself Mr Perfect. I don't watch CNN or any of that garbage. I'm just smart enough to know that electing somebody whose best case scenario is being a puppet for Russia is a horrible outcome for the world.

Of course his worst case scenario of nuclear annihilation is pretty bad too.

 

[Ricster]

Get over yourself Mr Perfect. I don't watch CNN or any of that garbage. I'm just smart enough to know that electing somebody whose best case scenario is being a puppet for Russia is a horrible outcome for the world.

Of course his worst case scenario of nuclear annihilation is pretty bad too.

Ah now we resort to insults because I don't share the same opinion. Can you point out where I claimed to be perfect. I just notice that your continued words are one sided and while I presented an opinion a few pages back about Hillary, which you chose to ignore, and you can't answer the previous question of are Trumps words on banning Muslims worse than what Hillary has caused in the bombing and murder of thousands of innocent people, including westerners there to help, I can't help but believe that you are pro Clinton and quite happy to allow her war mongering to continue