US Presidential Race 2016

[mat]

Oh.... Say can you see....

 

[CitizenTID]

Taking responsibility is a sign of leadership, it doesn't mean she could have done anything to stop them from being killed. Was Churchill responsible for England's security during WWII? Should he have been jailed because people died during the bombings? What the fuck could Hillary Clinton do about an embassy in Libya being attacked by terrorists? Or Colin Powell or Condy Rice during their terms as Sec of State?

What the article doesn't mention is that the republican congress repeatedly turned down requests for funds to improve embassy security all over the world.

And for future reference you should also stop believing the bullshit that CNN is some left-leaning news organization that supports Clinton. They actually hired Trump's former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski as a political correspondent. The man is on CNN's payroll and is still being paid by the Trump campaign. In addition, he signed a non-disclosure agreement with Trump and would be in breach of contract and lose money if he criticized Trump. So they're paying a Trump spokesperson to go on their shows and lie to the American people. CNN has also given over $1 billion to Trump in free airtime because he's good for ratings. They would absolutely love to see him win the election, their ratings would go through the roof with all of the rape allegations, fraud trials, war crimes and death and destruction he would cause.

I only provided that because you claimed otherwise to try and discredit my point (which I welcome you to do but you failed to). Now you've responded by going on a completely different tangent to things and besides presuming the type of media I got my info from previously, now your presuming what I feel regarding certain media.

All of this just reads as pointless drivel to other posters, so I'd rather not continue on this. I've found what you've added in the thread before really useful by the way, just don't presume where I'm coming from, read what I post as is.

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

No need, just stop being so ignorant and look to your best mate CNN:

http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/15/us/clinton-benghazi/index.html

I was actually referring to mainstream media which led me to believe that: BBC, Sky, CNN, the debates etc. Again though your omitting the context of using a private server for sharing confidential documents without state supervision - maybe someone else can weigh in on whether that is illegal or not because i'm sure other people have seen the same stuff I did in which it was discussed. As I've said, it's not even of concern to my point in any case.

Do you not understand that if it was illegal, then she would have been charged already? What is not to understand about that?

 

[Why Always Ste]

You know this shit is comical when Hilliary is using a former drug dealer to help her campaign for the black vote.

Sean Carter is more white than I am yet is used by the corporate elite when pushing to the black audience, and brainwashed yanks soak it up.

He's got 99 problems and a woman is one!!!

 

[buckshot]

There is nothing I've said that insinuates I believe myself to be an expert on anything relating to the US election (or anything else discussed on the forum for that matter), I've had a continual stance of open mindedness - I've not even outright disagreed with any opinion of yours, all I said is it irked me when people have overlooked what's in the emails and look at the election like a personality contest. You appear that you feel your opinion is threatened by something simple I've questioned - I've not even given an opinion on the thing in question (what's in the emails). You claim I'm out of my depth and a low-information person and in the same paragraph say that if you yourself cared more to research the issues you'd let it guide your opinion - think that over. I retained an element of doubt in any statement regarding illegality and provided information to say otherwise regarding what you appeared adamant to be true, but it's besides my point anyway.

There has been nothing in the emails that shows any crime at all. People don't realize that the leaked emails from John Podesta and the DNC are not under government jurisdiction in any way, political parties function the same as clubs and nothing more. If they want to influence the primaries and help one candidate they can do it. Just like if Bluemoon doesn't want to let people ask for links in game threads they can do that too, it's nobody else's business.

Of course Fox News doesn't tell people that because it won't get them their desired result. It's the same as when they reported that there was evidence of the State Department destroying phones with hammers. Now this is 100% true, under Secretary Clinton the State Department absolutely destroyed phones used for official government business with hammers, I'll admit that. They took the phones with government secrets and smashed them with hammers so nobody would ever be able to recover the information on them. This is obviously some evidence that they were trying to hide information and is horrible and everybody who was involved should go to jail.

***Except for the fact that standard State Department protocol requires all old devices used for official business that may contain sensitive information be destroyed.

Now, when Fox News reported about the phones guess which part they didn't mention?????

 

[buckshot]

Do you not understand that if it was illegal, then she would have been charged already? What is not to understand about that?

Look at you using facts and basic deductive reasoning!

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the smartest person on Bluemoon!

 

[CitizenTID]

Do you not understand that if it was illegal, then she would have been charged already? What is not to understand about that?

Even if I spent every waking minute researching everything surrounding the election, I wouldn't have time or access to info to know the ins and outs of everything so as we all must, I have to "skim research" certain things by way of taking what I see/read from mainstream news. Has she not already been found to have lied to congress (I can't recall) - at least 2 people surrounding the Snowden matters definitely did so it's not farfetched to question. There's enough smoke about incriminating evidence and enough investigations into her for me to question what's in the emails. As I said it's pretty irrelevant to me whether a private server use was illegal (US citizens should rightly care for security purposes).

 

[CitizenTID]

Look at you using facts and basic deductive reasoning!

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the smartest person on Bluemoon!

Point out a fact presented there?

 

[Uncle Wally One Ball]

Point out a fact presented there?

Well, that if it was illegal she would have been charged. Obviously you dont understand that.

 

[kaz7]

They didn't charge Hiliary they said there was nothing criminal
Simples