gingerprince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Oct 2007
- Messages
- 1,107
To JimB
Firstly,
I dont think "FFS" is a justified response to my directly quoted post
If you are going to quote me, try to just limit your responses, directly to my comments, not your continuing exasperation with other comments.
I've not said city or spurs have had more or less var decisions go against, or for them, So I dont need you, in a quoted response, to tell me,why
is that not hard to understand? You tell me I need to read more carefully? I have read all previous posts by you and the other poster you name.
My point was clear and precise...it was about the irony..
It merely pointed to the irony of any spurs fan on a city forum complaining now, about VAR, after that CL game when no Spurs fan was coming on here
complaining about VAR and your away support was screaming to us how happy they were with VAR then. You previously posted here, how you were done
over by VAR when they didnt send off one of the opposition players in one of your matches., Frederick's?, I've not seen that incident. I have no comment
on that incident one way or another and whether it in anyway supports your continuing dialogue with other posters. However, it merely provides support
to what I actually posted. Eg a Spurs fan, posting on a city forum after that CL game, complaining of having VAR decision go against them....& the irony.
Why you then accuse me of living in some protective bubble....or patronise me, that I dont understand banter, or again by trying to educate me by informing
me that its not meant to be taken seriously or literally.........
My initial post started with Irony, maybe you didnt read it carefully or maybe it was lost on you
Firstly,
I dont think "FFS" is a justified response to my directly quoted post
If you are going to quote me, try to just limit your responses, directly to my comments, not your continuing exasperation with other comments.
I've not said city or spurs have had more or less var decisions go against, or for them, So I dont need you, in a quoted response, to tell me,why
is that not hard to understand? You tell me I need to read more carefully? I have read all previous posts by you and the other poster you name.
My point was clear and precise...it was about the irony..
It merely pointed to the irony of any spurs fan on a city forum complaining now, about VAR, after that CL game when no Spurs fan was coming on here
complaining about VAR and your away support was screaming to us how happy they were with VAR then. You previously posted here, how you were done
over by VAR when they didnt send off one of the opposition players in one of your matches., Frederick's?, I've not seen that incident. I have no comment
on that incident one way or another and whether it in anyway supports your continuing dialogue with other posters. However, it merely provides support
to what I actually posted. Eg a Spurs fan, posting on a city forum after that CL game, complaining of having VAR decision
Why you then accuse me of living in some protective bubble....or patronise me, that I dont understand banter, or again by trying to educate me by informing
me that its not meant to be taken seriously or literally.........
My initial post started with Irony, maybe you didnt read it carefully or maybe it was lost on you