kaz7
Well-Known Member
We are being used to test VAR,they keep saying they look at everything in real time which is a lie,it would be done much quicker if they did
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
marco
Well-Known Member
didnt go to the game yesterday as i was working, my phone was on flashscores live update at 2-2 then 3-2, normally when this happens i will yelp out or mutter get the fuck in however this time was different i seen the 2 change to a 3 and thought ermmm we have scored but so what it will be corrected back to 2-2 in a minute, the passion has been sucked away and whats left is a feeling of distrust against the person/persons who are sat in front of a tv set making the final decision
kaz7
Well-Known Member
What is it with the if it hits a defenders arm it's not a pen,who thought that up,they are ruling out goals but not giving pens up the other end
Are you saying that the ball did not hit Laporte's arm?
I'm saying it's not conclusive, just like Sterling's offside vs West Ham. If it hit Laporte's arm then, fine it was handball because it lead to Jesus receiving the ball. But, where is the proof!?
In cricket, years ago they brought in technology which monitored sound waves to determine wether the ball hit the stump, everyone in the ground and those watching on TV knew what was going on. What angle was used by the VAR office to know for certain the ball hit Laporte's arms?
Why wasn't these two incidents reviewed by VAR? Rodri dragged to the ground and Rose held Aguero by using both of his hands to hold on to Kun's hand and stop his run. Same thing was done to Laporte in second half.
Barcon
Well-Known Member
That is what the referees came out and said. You might disagree with it, but that is how they are interpreting the rules this season.
I know what the referees have said mate. I am not disputing that it hit his arm. I am saying that according to the rules of the game, that does not constitute handball.
The only one interpreting what happened yesterday as handball is the person that was checking the var. Not sure who that was or whether or not he is knowledgeable on the subject.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,427
I know what the referees have said mate. I am not disputing that it hit his arm. I am saying that according to the rules of the game, that does not constitute handball.
The only one interpreting what happened yesterday as handball is the person that was checking the var. Not sure who that was or whether or not he is knowledgeable on the subject.
I totally agree, but unfortunately, like the Wolves goal, they are being disallowed for any handball in the lead up, rightly or wrongly.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
I'm saying it's not conclusive, just like Sterling's offside vs West Ham. If it hit Laporte's arm then, fine it was handball because it lead to Jesus receiving the ball. But, where is the proof!?
In cricket, years ago they brought in technology which monitored sound waves to determine wether the ball hit the stump, everyone in the ground and those watching on TV knew what was going on. What angle was used by the VAR office to know for certain the ball hit Laporte's arms?
Why wasn't these two incidents reviewed by VAR? Rodri dragged to the ground and Rose held Aguero by using both of his hands to hold on to Kun's hand and stop his run. Same thing was done to Laporte in second half.
Ref looking straight at it,why have monitors and have the guidelines that the refs don't use them,has anyone thought this through
Barcon
Well-Known Member
I totally agree, but unfortunately, like the Wolves goal, they are being disallowed for any handball in the lead up, rightly or wrongly.
There it is again mate, incorrect use of the word "handball".
I'll leave you to it. : )
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 60,427
There it is again mate, incorrect use of the word "handball".
I'll leave you to it. : )
Call it what you want to, but any touch of the ball from an attacker’s arm/hand that leads to a goal being scored is going to be disallowed this season.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
The rule itself is as clear as day.
"Any goal scored or created with the use of the hand or arm will be disallowed this season, even if it is accidental," says the Premier League.
Jesus' goal, technically, was created by the use of Laporte's arm, regardless of whether there was any intent.
The rule was changed after some high-profile goals were scored by the accidental use of a hand last season.
To give three Premier League examples:
Last August, Willy Boly scored for Wolves against Manchester City after the ball touched his arm.Alexandre Lacazette handled in the build-up to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang's goal for Arsenal at Crystal Palace in October Sergio Aguero used his hand in scoring his third for Manchester City against Arsenal in February
"Any goal scored or created with the use of the hand or arm will be disallowed this season, even if it is accidental," says the Premier League.
Jesus' goal, technically, was created by the use of Laporte's arm, regardless of whether there was any intent.
The rule was changed after some high-profile goals were scored by the accidental use of a hand last season.
To give three Premier League examples:
Last August, Willy Boly scored for Wolves against Manchester City after the ball touched his arm.Alexandre Lacazette handled in the build-up to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang's goal for Arsenal at Crystal Palace in October Sergio Aguero used his hand in scoring his third for Manchester City against Arsenal in February