Var debate 2019/20

[kaz7]

You don’t have any either. You have a still taken without context which you are debating with.

99% of people saw it happen. Saw the replay and thought, yeah, it has hit his arm, but he didn’t mean it and it should be a goal.

However, the rules now state it should be disallowed and that is what happened.

You’re now on a crusade to make yourself feel even worse than we already are by trying to argue it didn’t hit his arm.

Even if you convinced everyone in the world that it didn’t, what are you trying to achieve? It doesn’t change anything.

Sky looked at the replays and couldn't tell if it hit his arm so hardly 99%

 

[Barcon]

[/QUOTE]

It’s been said from the start of the season that any handball in the lead up to a goal would result in the goal being disallowed.

The Wolves goal against Leicester is the other example where the goal didn’t stand as it inadvertently hit Boly’s arm.

The definition of handball has been posted on here. No handball was committed.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Sky looked at the replays and couldn't tell if it hit his arm so hardly 99%

Ok Karen. Pick a number and put a % after it that suits your opinion.

No one has even tried to dispute it hit his hand apart from a few people on here.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

The definition of handball has been posted on here. No handball was committed.

The referees interpret the rules/laws. They have said that any handball by an attacker in the lead up to a goal will result in that goal being disallowed.

 

[citymad]

It hit both Ericksens and Eric's arm so who deflected it ? and surely they cancel each other out.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

It hit both Ericksens and Eric's arm so who deflected it ? and surely they cancel each other out.

It doesn’t matter as a defensive player who accidentally handles the ball isn’t committing a foul, whereas the attacker is.

That is where the rule is stupid.

 

[kaz7]

Ok Karen. Pick a number and put a % after it that suits your opinion.

No one has even tried to dispute it hit his hand apart from a few people on here.

You'd better speak to sky then and pep who watched it back before commenting

 

[Barcon]

The referees interpret the rules/laws. They have said that any handball by an attacker in the lead up to a goal will result in that goal being disallowed.

You are just repeating yourself when you know that I already read what you posted as I quoted your post. The referee has interpreted the law incorrectly.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You'd better speak to sky then and pep who watched it back before commenting

I’ll leave it thanks. It’s happened. I can’t change it.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

You are just repeating yourself when you know that I already read what you posted as I quoted your post. The referee has interpreted the law incorrectly.

That is what the referees came out and said. You might disagree with it, but that is how they are interpreting the rules this season.