northwichblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 2,079
Yes. They check all goals.
So they say!
Yes. They check all goals.
Whilst I agree with much of what you’re saying, the whole thing about the penalty is that some refs would give it and some wouldn’t give it and therefore VAR wouldn’t overrule the ref whatever they’d decided whilst watching it live (which is stupid as it’s a stonewall penalty and all refs should give it).So imagine that becomes the new interpretation ? Some refs will ignore it & correctly give a pen anyway, which won't be overturned, some will give it & then get it overturned, others will not give it at all.
Fake news that the "decisions were correct". Another example of repeating a lie enough times that it becomes the truth. There is no proof that the offside decisions last week at west ham were correct. There is evidence that the decisions were wrong. It's a varce.....
Its the supposed "clear and obvious" errors I have issue with...if sky can see Oliver didn't see it VAR surely could and intervene by telling him hes missed a clear and obvious penaltyWhilst I agree with much of what you’re saying, the whole thing about the penalty is that some refs would give it and some wouldn’t give it and therefore VAR wouldn’t overrule the ref whatever they’d decided whilst watching it live (which is stupid as it’s a stonewall penalty and all refs should give it).
The thing I’m annoyed at most by it is that the cûnt Oliver DID NOT see it as he’s looking the other way but he claimed he did and Swarbrick continued the lie.
Whilst I agree with much of what you’re saying, the whole thing about the penalty is that some refs would give it and some wouldn’t give it and therefore VAR wouldn’t overrule the ref whatever they’d decided whilst watching it live (which is stupid as it’s a stonewall penalty and all refs should give it).
The thing I’m annoyed at most by it is that the cûnt Oliver DID NOT see it as he’s looking the other way but he claimed he did and Swarbrick continued the lie.
Its the supposed "clear and obvious" errors I have issue with...if sky can see Oliver didn't see it VAR surely could and intervene by telling him hes missed a clear and obvious penalty
I think most people would be ok with it being in place to stop obvious offsides like Miler at a West Ham last season when he was two yards offside or to stop erroneous decisions like Milner playing a ball back and Sané being given as offside when he couldn’t have been.I dont know how people can like it. Its beyond me. They must be really boring in real life because they obviously arent bothered that the emotion is taken away in pursuit of the perceived correct decision
If after every goal there is a 90 second wait before its given .... then ill be out.
Such a shame
Shouldn't do, the laws of the game have a couple of lines about what happens if an offence occurs while the ball is still live before the ref blows - it still counts, as the player committing the infraction did not know that play would be stopped.Don't know if this as been asked yet but here goes.
If the accidental handball had led to Jesus being brought down and getting a penalty would it be ruled out by VAR?
I’m out till it’s scrapped, got a feeling i’ll be gone for good .I dont know how people can like it. Its beyond me. They must be really boring in real life because they obviously arent bothered that the emotion is taken away in pursuit of the perceived correct decision
If after every goal there is a 90 second wait before its given .... then ill be out.
Such a shame