Because he didn’t see that. It was entirely his fault in terms of his own interpretation of the handball yesterday.
Disagree mate. If Var checks every goal then two handballs in the build up, one leading directly to the pass that created Liverpool’s break leaving city players upfield appealing, should’ve resulted in the game being pulled back. I imagine the twats in stock let park laughing their cocks off as they chose not to interfere in an incident that allegedly this tech was created to resolve.Because he didn’t see that. It was entirely his fault in terms of his own interpretation of the handball yesterday.
It does because you’re suggesting there’s a better version of VAR available. There simply isn’t because any version is just a human making a decision once removed but it is still a human. Some on here think VAR can erase human error it can’t because it is still dependent on human decision making not just when they watch a replay but what to watch and from where to watch it. It’s the easiest way to control and manipulate the sport ever. It is a complete farce.What the fuck you on about? Your post makes no sense in reply to mine?
Who is City's representative at the PGMOL meeting on Thursday?
I’ve posted this before, but surely the technology is there (or thereabouts) for offsides to be determined exclusively via that means and thus taking the human element completely out of the equation.
It may require some tinkering around the ages of what constitutes being offside, with particular reference to what part of the body to include and exclude and how the ball being played forward is clearly defined, and it may also mean chipping players’ boots, and installing many more cameras, but it’s surely got to be possible, given current technological levels and would be one less thing for match officials to need to consider.
Who is City's representative at the PGMOL meeting on Thursday?
I am less than sure too, but it doesn’t undermine the point I was advancing; quite the opposite, in fact.If the objective is fair and unbiased decisions. Do you think that is the objective? I am far from sure that it is.
And does he have a gun?Who is City's representative at the PGMOL meeting on Thursday?
rugby seems to have it right, still think football is too fast for var ,and as for the goals how the fuck can they use something that takes away the whole point of football,its wank,nobody will make me change my mind on thatIt’s not VAR that is wank, it’s the orchestrated use of the laws to fck us over.
look at Rugby, it’s clear & honest.
the rules are applied & communicated, var with s the same in both but the people who apply the rules are corrupt.