Var debate 2019/20

BringBackSwales said:
David Gill - put in place to fuck us over
Sky tv - put in place to fuck us over
BT Sports- put in place to Fuchs us over
FFP - put in place to fuck us over
VAR - put in place to fuck us over
Next
Click to expand...
nah your're wrong on the sky tv and BT sports

armchairs and the shirts pay for them 2 ****s to do us over and do their best for said " ****s "

edit,gill brought in to apply the rules for said above ****s
 
Blue Mooner said:
Which includes 3 rag penalties in their favour all of which have been soft as sh*t.

3 penalties in 3 games so VAR is favouring the rags by not overturning incorrect decisions. VAR works both ways.

The idea I thought of VAR was to reduce if not eradicate incorrect decisions. It is completely and utterly failing and sh*tting on us at a great height.
Click to expand...
What a load of biased shite.

Var also didn’t give them two it could have done (and which they desperately needed) yesterday. If the fix was in then they’d have had no issue doing so.

Of course your post will get likes from people like Karen though as it’s unthinking dirge.
 
Mancity1980 said:
I am not exactly sure why it is there, 30 games played in the prem and as far as I am aware it hasn’t been used.
Click to expand...
They have told the refs not to use them because of the time it takes,i don't see it taking any more time than some of the reviews have taken so far,our last min winning goal should have been looked at by the ref,i'm sure nobody would have minded the wait then
 
That challenge on Merlin and non penalty was the evidence you need to realise VAR is being used tactically to stifle us.
It was EXACTLY the same challenge as one in the Swansea game earlier. Have a look and tell me it’s different.

VAR is rigged and is being used as and when they want to.

We will need to score at least 3 goals every game to counteract this blatant cheating.
 
SWP's back said:
What a load of biased shite.

Var also didn’t give them two it could have done (and which they desperately needed) yesterday. If the fix was in then they’d have had no issue doing so.

Of course your post will get likes from people like Karen though as it’s unthinking dirge.
Click to expand...
Oi fuck off sweep,giving them 5 pens in 3 games would have been a bit obvious,3 in 3 is already suspect
 
karen7 said:
Oi fuck off sweep,giving them 5 pens in 3 games would have been a bit obvious,3 in 3 is already suspect
Click to expand...
If you believe it’s bent then why do you even bother?

Can you tell me, if it’s bent, then why has no decision on a penalty been overturned in 29 matches rather than just us? Or is that to make it less obvious as well?

As for 3 in 3 being suspect, was it or was it not a penalty on McTominay (sp?) yesterday?

You’re talking biased crap. Every set of fans (just about) hates var already, everyone thinks it’s screwing them and that’s after 3 games. I’m sure it will be unanimous by game week 15. Var is absolutely not fit for purpose and their rules on ‘clear and obvious’ just have to change. But that doesn’t mean that City are the one and only target and saying that is the case is pure paranoia.
 
threadkiller said:
To be fair it was more then a very slight tug, there's no question it was a legit pen. Just not one we would ever win!
Click to expand...
(And it has nothing to do with VAR, which was my point).

If the ref hadn’t given it then var wouldn’t have either (going off every other penalty incident since the start of the season).
 
SWP's back said:
If you believe it’s bent then why do you even bother?

Can you tell me, if it’s bent, then why has no decision on a penalty been overturned in 29 matches rather than just us? Or is that to make it less obvious as well?

As for 3 in 3 being suspect, was it or was it not a penalty on McTominay (sp?) yesterday?

You’re talking biased crap. Every set of fans (just about) hates var already, everyone thinks it’s screwing them and that’s after 3 games. I’m sure it will be unanimous by game week 15. Var is absolutely not fit for purpose and their rules on ‘clear and obvious’ just have to change. But that doesn’t mean that City are the one and only target and saying that is the case is pure paranoia.
Click to expand...
To be fair, I don’t think it is bent because City is the only club being ****ed, as you are right, it isn’t.

I think it may be bent because there is exactly one club that has not yet really had any real VAR issues.

Still plenty of the season to go, of course, but I do have a strong feeling that they will only have VAR issues when it will not really hinder their progress in the league (so as to skew the statistics and cover the ultimate influence on outcomes, as it were).
 
SebastianBlue said:
To be fair, I don’t think it is bent because City is the only club being ****ed, as you are right, it isn’t.

I think it may be bent because there is exactly one club that has not yet really had any VAR issues.
Click to expand...
Proof will be in the pudding on that one. If everyone’s fears prove correct, I’ll be done with the sport. I wouldn’t see the point.

But there hasn’t been any of their goals remotely close to needing var yet. I’m sure that will change when they stop playing shite.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top