Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,791
For VAR to improve those using it would need to accept that it needs improving. Not gonna happen
And that’s the issue who the fuck knows what actually goes on. Can put the line where they want based on when they decide the balls been played. Fucking worst thing to happen to football as it gives the ability to control goals and therefore outcomes. In the next 6 games I’ll be amazed if it doesn’t decide our title chancesEverton v forest;
Claim 1 is usually given, but occasionally not. Unlucky
Claim 2 is far too close to be handball in my opinion
Claim 3 absolutely should be a penalty.
To not get anything from 1&3 is pretty desperate officiating in my opinion
Coventry v United offside is offside, according to the evidence they showed. But whether the tech is good enough to offer robust evidence to disallow at such fine margins, is pretty murky!! V unlucky Coventry
If there are humans involved in the VAR application, it can be manipulated.Why can’t clubs call into question highly dubious officiating? Who’s the boss? Serious question.
the premier league appoint pigmob to do a job, if they are shit then the Premier League can fuck them off, who exactly are the Premier League? The twenty clubs that each hold an equal share. So I ask again, why can’t the shareholders question the performance of an organisation they employ? Why can’t an individual shareholder ask such questions?
Italy and Spain and other countries have had recent refereeing scandals. why is it beyond the realm of possibility that it could happen in England
That’s exactly how he sounds every time he’s commentating when L’pool are onCarragher on Forest's statement: "But that, what I've just read there on social media, that's like a fan in a pub."
You make a fucking living out of that”
Agree and that’s why it’s completely valid to question irregular behaviour.If there are humans involved in the VAR application, it can be manipulated.