VAR Discussion Thread | 2024/25

So when the 'clear and obvious' bollocks is left up to the ref as a 50-50, it's best not to challenge it? It could be a pen, like the Grealish 'handball.

Me? I'd have liked my capt to challenge what was deemed an 'unnatural position' for his arm to be in. You, it seems, would have just let it be ref'd as is.
I’m confused as to how you think the captain challenging a decision would make any difference What would he say? I think you are wrong
Ref let me have another look No I’m right
They don’t change their mind
I guess we could have the captains do a degree in bio- mechanics then they might be able to add some substance to their argument?
 
Me, there wouldn’t be any discussion it’s the ref’s decision and there wouldn’t be any VAR end of. Like I said we play football on grass not in a lab it’s never going to be perfect and VAR is so anomalous that it’s waste of time and spoils the game
There are numerous incidents that have been spotted by VAR yet no one on the field ref players or managers have appealed, then the game is stopped and 4 minutes later after numerous slow motions freeze frames the ref runs to the monitor then makes a decision this is claimed that the ref made a mistake that was “clear and obvious”
You are having a laugh

Okay.

There is LITERALLY a thread about the handling of Haaland which should be given as penalties much of the time. This is ignored, but should be challenged. Maybe cos the lads know the ref won't do anything about it cos we're City and Guardiola doesn't want to whinge like Klopp, Teta or Moaninho would, we don't say anything.

However, if challenges were allowed all that BS holding would stop cos we'd bang about this!!

Not sure why you disagree about this stuff!
 
I’m confused as to how you think the captain challenging a decision would make any difference What would he say? I think you are wrong
Ref let me have another look No I’m right
They don’t change their mind
I guess we could have the captains do a degree in bio- mechanics then they might be able to add some substance to their argument?

Well, it becomes inclusive and, as I said before, it brings the ref into the spotlight more. In cricket and tennis mistakes happen and are corrected.

Why not the same for a game where shit loads of incidents can happen in a short space of time? Funnily enough, there's also financial penalties to think about in the wider context as I said before from bad decisions that accumulate over the season.
 
But he got it right with the first look then made it wrong with the second look How was it a clear an obvious error in the first place in any case
Why only somethings get a second look surely you want it to be everything?

That would depend on what the referee told the VAR. If he’d told him he saw the ball touch the hand but didn’t think it was a penalty, the VAR would have to decide he’d made an obvious error to recommend a review. Which he’d have been highly unlikely to do in this case.

What’s far more likely here, is the referee hadn’t seen the ball touch the hand at all. Then the VAR can inform him he is factually incorrect about that. There was a clear, if feint touch. It then changes to him recommending a review based on the new information the referee has.
 
Okay.

There is LITERALLY a thread about the handling of Haaland which should be given as penalties much of the time. This is ignored, but should be challenged. Maybe cos the lads know the ref won't do anything about it cos we're City and Guardiola doesn't want to whinge like Klopp, Teta or Moaninho would, we don't say anything.

However, if challenges were allowed all that BS holding would stop cos we'd bang about this!!

Not sure why you disagree about this stuff!
Nor sure why you think appeals is a good idea
“Handling”
How would it stop?
The officials would reject the appeal, they regarding holding in the penalty area as legitimate they have even invented a new excuse “the holding didn’t happen for long enough”

Would you then want an independent appeal panel?
 
Nor sure why you think appeals is a good idea
“Handling”
How would it stop?
The officials would reject the appeal, they regarding holding in the penalty area as legitimate they have even invented a new excuse “the holding didn’t happen for long enough”

Would you then want an independent appeal panel?

I'm not arguing against your opinion. I find reflecting on another's PoV useful exercise.

However the only reason things don't change is us. The Dippers, Scum and Arse are all very vocal to complain about 'incidents' and they say it loud enough, long enough; we're quiet.

Whilst there's some dignity in 'turning the other cheek', surely that only has so much to endure as a club? In my mind, the ref's decision is changed all the time via VAR as we saw last season. This season, as noted, VAR has gotten involved less, leaving the opportunity to have that gap filled with Capts challenging decisions not right.

Don't get me wrong, I've thought about the game slowing, but I don't think it's much of a change to anything we haven't experienced already..
 

THE NOEL EDMONDS COOKABILITY ROADSHOW AWARD FOR GASLIGHTING


Those slack-jawed yokels at Stockley Park, making everything up as they go along, gently patting the top of their heads with the flat of their palms, holding their rulebooks upside down, tape snagging in their video machines, their rulers all floppy and bendy, hot fire coming out of the cold taps, good process lads, good process. We could list all of the egregious decisions they made in 2024, but instead why not print out this page and fill in all the examples of your club being genuinely and demonstrably done over by these clowns?

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________

__________________________________________
 
Great stuff, thanks, sorry we couldn’t give you enough room. There are space limits, even on the internet. But just imagine: the clubs had an opportunity to vote this lot out of existence and bottled it. A missed opportunity for a brighter future that puts comparative ballot-box fiascos such as the EU referendum, Scottish independence and the 2019 election in the shade.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.