VAR Discussion Thread | 2024/25

Thing is with second yellows.

A players first foul may be very soft. His second yellow offence may be warranted.

So after the ref issues the second yellow card leading to a red card, does the ref go back to the first yellow and re cind that one?

We are gonna see players committing proper yellow card offences first then getting soft second yellow cards wiped off via VAR, but not the other way round as I describe above.

How can that be fair??

No, there's no suggestion that first yellows will be re-looked at. Or potential second yellows that the referee hasn't given, which was originally suggested. The suggestion is strictly second yellows that the VAR considers clearly wrong.

Having a soft yellow followed by proper yellow isn't really a VAR thing. It's always existed. Maybe it isn't 'fair' but the difference is that the player knows he's on a yellow, however soft it was, and plays the rest of the game accordingly. Look at Rodri for a good example of that. Seems to get booked virtually every game he plays. But never once in his career has he got a second yellow. Very clever player.
 
I tend not to criticize the officials too much, the game is fast, as you say another player was blocking his view... so why on earth would you not give them some help ? when we have the tools to do so.

You're letting officials off the hook by claiming he would have kept his flag down anyway, I don't think so - pre VAR these type of clear but obstructed offsides were given as goals all the time, I have no doubt that the lino yesterday just didn't see the offside - I dont blame him, its a tough job - but on review it was well clear. Liverpool pre VAR would have had a offside goal count yesterday - that simply is not right.

same for Man Utd being awarded a corner when the ball never went out.

without VAR there is constant injustices, far more that outweigh the odd cock up with VAR.

when teams are getting screwed over - they demand VAR. Good luck to anyone who lives in the fantasy land that we would all be happier if VAR was scrapped.



“without VAR there is constant injustices, far more that outweigh the odd cock up with VAR.”

You pay to watch matches where there are “constant injustices”.
Chacun à son goût.
 
I tend not to criticize the officials too much, the game is fast, as you say another player was blocking his view... so why on earth would you not give them some help ? when we have the tools to do so.

You're letting officials off the hook by claiming he would have kept his flag down anyway, I don't think so - pre VAR these type of clear but obstructed offsides were given as goals all the time,
Occasionally perhaps, not "all the time". As usual, you're exaggerating what it was like pre-VAR to attempt to justify VAR's necessity. And to be clear, given the state of football today, given where we are with VAR, I am trying to be as constructive as I can as far as how VAR could potentially be improved. And I would challenge you, as much as you like VAR, to apply scrutiny to VAR and acknowledge the problems of the system in its current form.

Now we both agree that, on its own at least, having quick automatic VAR checks when a corner or a goal kick is given could be beneficial and on its own shouldn't be much of a disruption relative to the other ways that VAR already disrupts a match. And again, corner kick / goal kick decisions are entirely factual. So the chances of them getting a wrong decision following a review would be very low compared to the chances of them getting a more subjective pen / no pen decision wrong or even some offsides.

I have no doubt that the lino yesterday just didn't see the offside - I dont blame him, its a tough job - but on review it was well clear. Liverpool pre VAR would have had a offside goal count yesterday - that simply is not right.

same for Man Utd being awarded a corner when the ball never went out.

without VAR there is constant injustices, far more that outweigh the odd cock up with VAR.

when teams are getting screwed over - they demand VAR.

I can pretty much prove that isn't the case by citing a separate example from the Forest United match.

In the early 43rd minute, Forest chipped it into the box to a player clearly offside. The referee, as is often the case in these kinds of situations since VAR has been introduced, kept his flag down and allowed the shot to take place. The ball was saved then kicked out of danger and about to be cleared out fully when the flag finally came up, way late and well after the infraction.

Now ask yourself this. Had a goal been scored there, would the Lino have put his flag up? Think about this, he wouldn't have had to if a goal was scored, because it would be automatically reviewed at that point. And with a goal being scored there or with it being saved and kicked out as it was, if he didn't put the flag up, then there presumably would be a VAR review anyway. The point is, under VAR, when to put the flag up is all based on what ends up happening, often separate to the actual incident.

This is where the fallacy of VAR being needed to correct mistakes is so glaring. Had that goal been scored, following the clear offside player in which play was allowed to continue, either the ref puts the flag up after the goal is scored as he did following the save, or he doesn't. i.e. If a goal is scored, it wouldn't matter, it would be going to review regardless. If a goal isn't scored, then the flag goes up, late after the save, or he keeps the flag down and there's a VAR review for the offsides infraction to correct a flag not going up when it should have.

But in pre-VAR days, chances are the shot never gets taken because the lino puts the flag up immediately because he has to then and there. But with VAR, you can keep the flag down for a variety of reasons, all to do with VAR, and then you come along and say "see, the ref made a mistake, he is blind, we need VAR" when in reality that's not why he kept the flag down, as evidenced by the incident in the early 43rd minute.

As far as teams getting screwed over and endlessly are demanding VAR or more VAR, this is a byproduct of the effect that VAR has had on the sport and on our consciousness as fans. This seems to be an endless vicious cycle of complaining every time VAR is used, or isn't. And this sort of thing didn't exist before VAR was introduced.
 
That's really not the truth.

One cock up with VAR is massively met with outrage - and i don't mind that, there shouldn't really be major mistakes with VAR - but I've always said it will just happen time to time but ultimately over a weekend of many many games it happens in one or two.

what we see without VAR, is clear offside goals being allowed to stand, red card incidents going unpunished and most notably players diving in the box with zero contact and being awarded a penalty - I remember all these incidences on a far regular basis than most others it seems.

I go watch my local team Ebbsfleet and seen Charlton a few times this year, many games where the game was farcical with some of the decisions being made. Its more comical than annoyance.

That sentence ive highlighted is simple not ture . The fans might be pissed of but depending on which teams it is will depend on how the press report it.

I dont remember much outrage from the press/media over this cheating.

1000029790.jpg
 
So The Rags second. Was it offside? Their no.4 had to duck his head and was coming out from an offside position (just) and was in the view of the keeper. Why did VAR not look at this?
Good point. That's "possible" interference there. It does appear he was offsides, only just but enough to be sure he was from the replay. Then it's did he interfere. Looking at it again, I don't think he blocked the keeper's line of sight, I also don't think the keeper could have got to it. The check appeared to be for a possible handball, it's unclear if they even looked at the possible offside and interference aspect of it.

And again all this only reinforces how woefully inadequate VAR continues to be. It is fair to say, with no bias whatsoever, that United was very fortunate to have drawn that match. I mean, the first goal definitely shouldn't have counted due to the phantom corner. Then with the second goal a possible offsides, or a possible handball apparently.

It is frustrating to have to put up with all the warts of VAR and for there to be an ongoing seemingly neverending amount of controversy despite or maybe in spite of it.
 
Good point. That's "possible" interference there. It does appear he was offsides, only just but enough to be sure he was from the replay. Then it's did he interfere. Looking at it again, I don't think he blocked the keeper's line of sight, I also don't think the keeper could have got to it. The check appeared to be for a possible handball, it's unclear if they even looked at the possible offside and interference aspect of it.

And again all this only reinforces how woefully inadequate VAR continues to be. It is fair to say, with no bias whatsoever, that United was very fortunate to have drawn that match. I mean, the first goal definitely shouldn't have counted due to the phantom corner. Then with the second goal a possible offsides, or a possible handball apparently.

It is frustrating to have to put up with all the warts of VAR and for there to be an ongoing seemingly neverending amount of controversy despite or maybe in spite of it.
All the points you've covered are valid points.
I therefore have to ask, why have var? Fans (without var) would be sat in the pub discussing each contentious decision.
Yesterday, with Var, they are sat in the pub discussing each contenious decision. All var does is fuck the game up bringing more controversy with it.
 
All the points you've covered are valid points.
I therefore have to ask, why have var? Fans (without var) would be sat in the pub discussing each contentious decision.
Yesterday, with Var, they are sat in the pub discussing each contenious decision. All var does is fuck the game up bringing more controversy with it.
You don't have to convince me that VAR needs immediate sacking wholly and fully. The problem is that as much as we despise this system, it doesn't seem to be going anywhere anytime soon. So in an effort to be as constructive as possible, I am trying to think this through and look for ways in which VAR could actually be improved. And this is not easy, because it does need a complete binning. We hear a lot about how VAR needs a major rethink, we've heard this for years, including from Pro-VARers who insist it can work but that it needs to get better and all that. Well, we've never seen a major rethink of VAR actually implemented. FWIW I have some ideas but I just want to be clear that my personal view is that VAR does not belong in football. This is a very difficult problem to remedy for a variety of reasons. But I'm trying, and I'm trying to reason with Hammer, because #1 he could use a friend around here, and #2 VAR continues to drive most of us mad, and calling for it to be sacked doesn't seem to be doing anything. So given the situation as it exists, I would urge everyone involved to push for a major rethink of VAR. I may outline what I have in mind in more detail later, but for now let me be clear that I agree with you 100%, that VAR solves nothing and creates way more problems than there ever was before. It absolutely should be binned given the state of it, however short of that a major rethink is needed.

Now given the proximity to the upcoming World Cup next year, a VAR rethink being implemented prior to the WC doesn't seem feasible, which means we're already right up against another season of VAR in its current form barring some kind of massive VAR controversy or outrage at the World Cup.
 
I have issue with flags not been raised, against Villa a player received the ball in offside position no flag, however he controlled ball and then brought it backwards, play continued as normal they didn’t go into score but they retained the ball. So how far back does VAR go, 1,2,3 minutes, regardless they gained an advantage in retaining the ball whilst offside, they may not score but they still kept the ball. It’s like players been offside but they may not ball by passes them to someone else, they can then join up play but have gained yards on a defender already! Don’t get me started on the Rashford bollocks that was so corrupt I think a Turkish ref was in VAR that day.
 
Remember when we were told it was a penalty because even though our defender touched the ball first, it wasn't a significant enough touch?

The same **** on coms has just made the opposite case for a Newcastle player. "Clearly just touches the ball with his studs", well that apparently wasn't enough for our defenders and the penalty was still awarded.

We clearly are refereed to different standards.
 
You're letting officials off the hook by claiming he would have kept his flag down anyway, I don't think so - pre VAR these type of clear but obstructed offsides were given as goals all the time, I have no doubt that the lino yesterday just didn't see the offside - I dont blame him, its a tough job - but on review it was well clear.
How many times do you remember this happening in the 7 years pre-VAR? You always say that there were ridiculously obvious offside goals given "all the time", what instances can you remember from the 7 years pre-VAR?

You talk about diving now being punished whereas before VAR, players would get away with diving "all the time". In your honest opinion, do you think there is more or less simulation and gamesmanship in the Premier League now compared to the 7 years before VAR.
 
Remember when we were told it was a penalty because even though our defender touched the ball first, it wasn't a significant enough touch?

The same **** on coms has just made the opposite case for a Newcastle player. "Clearly just touches the ball with his studs", well that apparently wasn't enough for our defenders and the penalty was still awarded.

We clearly are refereed to different standards.
The cunts make it up as they go along.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top