bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
VAR is a joke - can't the authorities see it?
Boy if that happened at 1-1, there would probably be actual violence lol.Actually screwed Liverpool as they now have their best player suspended
Didn’t affect the result. Now if it had been 1-1 at the time it would be different
It was absolutely 100% the correct decisionDoesnt matter, missing the point there.
That was a pathetic decision.
Then again Alisson wouldn't have been out of his goal at 1-1.Actually screwed Liverpool as they now have their best player suspended
Didn’t affect the result. Now if it had been 1-1 at the time it would be different
Haaland is going to score and is fouled. Ref plays an advantageAbsolute fucking joke of a decision, hilarious to see some of the 'by the letter of the law it was correct' reactions. Decision made no logical sense whatsoever
That’s true. Why he stayed up after the set piece only he knows. Thankfully it wasn’t his only error in judgement lolThen again Alisson wouldn't have been out of his goal at 1-1.
The debate is whether var is ruining the spirit of the game. And today, it didIt was absolutely 100% the correct decision
Now if it is within the spirit of the game you can debate but what is not up for debate is within the rules it’s the correct decision
I think some of us have been conditioned into accepting that we will be screwed over each game. Liverpool get that at their end and not a word is said by anyone.Absolute fucking joke of a decision, hilarious to see some of the 'by the letter of the law it was correct' reactions. Decision made no logical sense whatsoever
So why didnt the referee blow his whistle ? Refs are allowed to use discretion, its why they often play advantage, its why the liverpool player wasnt booked after 10 minutes for a blatant shirt pull. Today Pawson used his common sense and discretion. It was a goal, he should have had the courage to stand by his decision, sadly he didnt.It was absolutely 100% the correct decision
Now if it is within the spirit of the game you can debate but what is not up for debate is within the rules it’s the correct decision
So you don’t want officials to apply the laws of the game?The debate is whether var is ruining the spirit of the game. And today, it did
Ref gave it, it was morally correct to give it, var should keep their beak out
Yes. He played advantage with the foul on Haaland.So why didnt the referee blow his whistle ? Refs are allowed to use discretion, its why they often play advantage, its why the liverpool player wasnt booked after 10 minutes for a blatant shirt pull. Today Pawson used his common sense and discretion. It was a goal, he should have had the courage to stand by his decision, sadly he didnt.
I want football in all its warts n all. Var is a failure so id rather not have it full stop.So you don’t want officials to apply the laws of the game?
Do you think var is a success?So you don’t want officials to apply the laws of the game?