west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 34,029
Realsies??
Realsies??
I know “realsies” ffs.Disgraceful.
don't need a cure - the victims just need to get over themselvesHave they still not found a cure for this yet?
Coming soon:
don't need a cure - the victims just need to get over themselves
Awesome video (whatever you think about 'veganism')
https://www.eatjust.com/en-us/stories/meat
Q: When do you expect to have the first clean meat product on the market?
A: By the end of 2018.
Awesome video (whatever you think about 'veganism')
https://www.eatjust.com/en-us/stories/meat
Q: When do you expect to have the first clean meat product on the market?
A: By the end of 2018.
Strange rant and not very logical
It is perfectly possible to farm in a way that involves less suffering to creatures than a 'natural existence' would do ie one without human intervention.
.
I disagree with this, whilst you can farm ethically and sustainably, it's not possible to feed 7bn people in a 'natural existance'
I disagree with this, whilst you can farm ethically and sustainably, it's not possible to feed 7bn people in a 'natural existance'
Maybe the problem is that there are 7bn people then?
Personally, I don't eat anything I wouldn't kill myself. I think it's an ethical position. I don't eat pigs, cows or sheep as I'd probably shy away from stabbing them. Chickens, no problem, I've killed loads of them. Ditto fish. Except carp. I like carp.
That at least has some level of consistency. It's respectable to a point. The (some would call it arbitrary) distinction between a bird/fish and a mammal makes your own personal take less silly, than those who pet their dogs yet eat cows. I'd point you to the the article above.. Chickens and fish are sentient beings worthy or consideration.
I don't doubt it. I'm a mindful predator and aware of the price other creatures pay. I've been considering my position for years. It's the widespread ignorance of separating flesh from life I refuse to be a part of.