super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 54,081
Oh I dunno
![]()
hahah at first glance i thought that said 'solvent green'
Oh I dunno
![]()
Good, it'd take away all the fun if they didn't.
There is no 'harm free' existence. I don't think most vegans pretend otherwise. Veganism: "Is a way of living which seeks to exclude, as far as is possible and practicable, all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose."
At the heart of one's ethics should be consistency. Why treat or knowingly promote the exploitation of a thing with no real justification for doing so?
The justification for me is in nature. I live in the world, I'm not a passenger on it. Veganism is an artificial ideal that's only possible in a food net Western economy. That said, I respect conscious living and vegans are thoughtful at least.
I look at veganism as philosophical position (and that is what it is usually described as) Appeal to nature is a fallacy. We are of nature of course, what isn't? But it isn't an excuse. We do our 'can't give a shit' stuff, but there is a logic to veganism that is undeniable.
They have a choice and opinion. That is where it should endThe justification for me is in nature. I live in the world, I'm not a passenger on it. Veganism is an artificial ideal that's only possible in a food net Western economy. That said, I respect conscious living and vegans are thoughtful at least.
Philosophically at its basic level is an animals only purpose on earth is too provide food for other animals ? It's not called a food chain for nothing, as for the logic to veganism ? Are you denyig the logic of evolution ?I look at veganism as philosophical position (and that is what it is usually described as) Appeal to nature is a fallacy. We are of nature of course, what isn't? But it isn't an excuse. We do our 'can't give a shit' stuff, but there is a logic to veganism that is undeniable.
Philosophically at its basic level is an animals only purpose on earth is too provide food for other animals ? It's not called a food chain for nothing, as for the logic to veganism ? Are you denyig the logic of evolution ?
Toby wants to know by the way, the ecosystem is delicate I'm sure you'll agree, you might find this hard to believe but I'm a bit of an ecomentalist at heart, all matter gets recycled mostly though the food chain, my fight is with ethical sourcing of food not what you eat, I'll only ever support hunting if it's to provide a food source, or pest control and i've got my own views on that, I know your views on farmers is bad and I can empathise with that, I know some great ones that keep rare breeds better than thier wives, ask and I'll take you to one, or an ethical hunt, no guns no dogs, no trapsPurpose is a tricky word. To what end are all these 'sacrifices' made? But, ok, let's go with the the circle-of-life stuff. How does this enter the realms of ethics? Are you saying that because this is the way of things, that it must be right/good?
Toby wants to know by the way, the ecosystem is delicate I'm sure you'll agree, you might find this hard to believe but I'm a bit of an ecomentalist at heart, all matter gets recycled mostly though the food chain, my fight is with ethical sourcing of food not what you eat, I'll only ever support hunting if it's to provide a food source, or pest control and i've got my own views on that, I know your views on farmers is bad and I can empathise with that, I know some great ones that keep rare breeds better than thier wives, ask and I'll take you to one, or an ethical hunt, no guns no dogs, no traps
Give ot a rest
some of us eat meat and ain't gonna change
some of us are vegetarians
some or us are vegans
this thread was originallý informative, now it's a bit preachy.
each to their fucking own I say
Thread is hereby useless.. Urban Genie said so. Veganism is debunked.. Ethics is a non subject.
Thread is hereby useless.. Urban Genie said so. Veganism is debunked.. Ethics is a non subject.
I look at veganism as philosophical position (and that is what it is usually described as) Appeal to nature is a fallacy. We are of nature of course, what isn't? But it isn't an excuse. We do our 'can't give a shit' stuff, but there is a logic to veganism that is undeniable.
Clearly a member of PETA - People Eating Tasty Animals.Not bothered how it gets there, as long as the end product is tasty.
I'm not seeing the undeniable logic. What I am seeing is assertion dressed up as fact.
If nature is as nature is. Then veganism is unnatural.
I don't really follow your last point, sorry. I think the argument is dirt simple. (Unnecessary) harm is bad (I think most people would grant that) so, animals being the conscious, sentient, pain feeling creatures they are, it would be wrong to inflict harm on them for trivial reasons. Eg. Taste buds.