You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Video Technology
- Thread starter mancity1
- Start date
onceabluealways said:I think the way it has to be brought in is through the fourth official watching the game with quick replays - let the ref make the decisions and then the foutrth official does a quick check if the ref is BLATENTLY wrong then he lets him know and it's overturned.
Will make being at the game interesting as - PEN is given, supporters go wild, 10 secs later it's overturned and attacker gets yellow card, other supportersgo wild and take the mick.
I expect within a short time a lot of the diving would also stop in the box as the players would know whats coming.
Also if there is a off the ball incident then if 4th official seen it - lets ref know game stopped and player sent off immediately or booked at next normal break.
I don't see many down side to video technology
100% this, great call
Why Always Ste
Well-Known Member
the-ecstacy-of-eight said:^^^^THIS all day long.
It seriously feels like the refs this year have been given orders to balls it up as often as possible in some sort of ploy to get video technology introduced ASAP.
This isn't such a tin-hat view you know, I'm beginning to wonder myself if this has been the case to get the general football fan on the side of technology by purposely making high profile errors.
I disliked the idea of technology in the game, but now since this season I'm hardened to the view that we need it... and preferably referee's mic'd up so we can highlight the disgusting mouth of those rag twats such as rooney
Mr.Banks
Well-Known Member
milly08 said:Rugby union and rugby league are both light years ahead of football with the use of video technolog and with hardly any delays. The old argument of things even up over a season is rubbish, as Harry Redknapp will tell you today
This is true and what would be wrong with an independent timekeeper as well?
JamesR
Active Member
Mr.Banks said:milly08 said:Rugby union and rugby league are both light years ahead of football with the use of video technolog and with hardly any delays. The old argument of things even up over a season is rubbish, as Harry Redknapp will tell you today
This is true and what would be wrong with an independent timekeeper as well?
having a mic on the ref's like they do in rugby would be AMAZING and would solve a lot of the problems with weak referees being influenced by players/managers/crowds and force them to think twice before making a decision, knowing that the whole country would be listening to their explanation.
I'd like to see refs mic'd up and a rule in place that the captain (and captain only) of each team is allowed to approach the referee during stoppages and ask him politely to explain a decision. It would solve so many problems.
JamesR said:Mr.Banks said:milly08 said:Rugby union and rugby league are both light years ahead of football with the use of video technolog and with hardly any delays. The old argument of things even up over a season is rubbish, as Harry Redknapp will tell you today
This is true and what would be wrong with an independent timekeeper as well?
I'd like to see refs mic'd up and a rule in place that the captain (and captain only) of each team is allowed to approach the referee during stoppages and ask him politely to explain a decision. It would solve so many problems.
If I had the power to make one change in football this would be it
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
onceabluealways said:I think the way it has to be brought in is through the fourth official watching the game with quick replays - let the ref make the decisions and then the foutrth official does a quick check if the ref is BLATENTLY wrong then he lets him know and it's overturned.
Will make being at the game interesting as - PEN is given, supporters go wild, 10 secs later it's overturned and attacker gets yellow card, other supportersgo wild and take the mick.
I expect within a short time a lot of the diving would also stop in the box as the players would know whats coming.
Also if there is a off the ball incident then if 4th official seen it - lets ref know game stopped and player sent off immediately or booked at next normal break.
I don't see many down side to video technology
So what happens with the decisions when everyone is split and no one really knows even with the benefit of replays??
This is overlooked in Rugby as well no one really cares. We dont have 30 page pull outs for Rugby in papers. Sports sections in newspapers are dedicated football with some little bits of other sports thrown in. The problem is video technology problems are ignored because most other sports are seen as small time compared to football<br /><br />-- Mon Apr 16, 2012 11:07 am --<br /><br />
JamesR said:Mr.Banks said:milly08 said:Rugby union and rugby league are both light years ahead of football with the use of video technolog and with hardly any delays. The old argument of things even up over a season is rubbish, as Harry Redknapp will tell you today
This is true and what would be wrong with an independent timekeeper as well?
having a mic on the ref's like they do in rugby would be AMAZING and would solve a lot of the problems with weak referees being influenced by players/managers/crowds and force them to think twice before making a decision, knowing that the whole country would be listening to their explanation.
I'd like to see refs mic'd up and a rule in place that the captain (and captain only) of each team is allowed to approach the referee during stoppages and ask him politely to explain a decision. It would solve so many problems.
With the language on a football pitch??
The captains are supposed to be the only ones that approach anyway. That happened for about 6 minutes of the opening game before surrounding the ref came back
I agree goal line technology should be brought in – it’s a no-brainer.
HOWEVER – I don’t actually think yesterday should strengthen the case for it. Goal line technology should be used to help referees when it’s a difficult decision to make – there shouldn’t have even been a need for technology yesterday.
Technology should be brought in but it shouldn’t be used to paper over the cracks of the fact that the standard of referring is an absolute outrage. Referees are incapable of making basic decisions - it is gross incompetence and something has to be done about it – as well as bringing in technology
HOWEVER – I don’t actually think yesterday should strengthen the case for it. Goal line technology should be used to help referees when it’s a difficult decision to make – there shouldn’t have even been a need for technology yesterday.
Technology should be brought in but it shouldn’t be used to paper over the cracks of the fact that the standard of referring is an absolute outrage. Referees are incapable of making basic decisions - it is gross incompetence and something has to be done about it – as well as bringing in technology
BoyBlue_1985
Well-Known Member
wireblue said:I agree goal line technology should be brought in – it’s a no-brainer.
HOWEVER – I don’t actually think yesterday should strengthen the case for it. Goal line technology should be used to help referees when it’s a difficult decision to make – there shouldn’t have even been a need for technology yesterday.
Technology should be brought in but it shouldn’t be used to paper over the cracks of the fact that the standard of referring is an absolute outrage. Referees are incapable of making basic decisions - it is gross incompetence and something has to be done about it – as well as bringing in technology
Yes but the difference is he called it, with goal line technology someone could of just said your wrong and its done with
BoyBlue_1985 said:wireblue said:I agree goal line technology should be brought in – it’s a no-brainer.
HOWEVER – I don’t actually think yesterday should strengthen the case for it. Goal line technology should be used to help referees when it’s a difficult decision to make – there shouldn’t have even been a need for technology yesterday.
Technology should be brought in but it shouldn’t be used to paper over the cracks of the fact that the standard of referring is an absolute outrage. Referees are incapable of making basic decisions - it is gross incompetence and something has to be done about it – as well as bringing in technology
Yes but the difference is he called it, with goal line technology someone could of just said your wrong and its done with
Yes i know - i'm not arguing against that - i'm just saying that technology shouldn't be brought in just because referees are an absolute disgrace. It should be there so that decisions can be made which a human being couldn't possibly make with certainty - i really am all for it.
But technology should be brough in as well as addressing the ineptitude of the current crop of spineless bastards we currently have officiating matches