Virgil van Dijk

Status
Not open for further replies.
Given the prick mourinho’s comments yesterday it would have been music to his and the media ears had we shelled out the ludicrous amount of £75m. No doubt we’d have been accused of buying the title after that. We should try and unsettle Bailly at United to really piss them off.
 
If we had paid £75 million for a 29 year old defender, we would (rightly in my opinion) be vilified in the press. This is £21 million more than our record signing. Let's sit back and watch the media demolish Liverpool....... I have a feeling we'll be waiting a while.
 
If we had paid £75 million for a 29 year old defender, we would (rightly in my opinion) be vilified in the press. This is £21 million more than our record signing. Let's sit back and watch the media demolish Liverpool....... I have a feeling we'll be waiting a while.

Hes 26.
 
If we had paid £75 million for a 29 year old defender, we would (rightly in my opinion) be vilified in the press. This is £21 million more than our record signing. Let's sit back and watch the media demolish Liverpool....... I have a feeling we'll be waiting a while.
He's 26.
 
That must be why Pep, Conte & Klopp all wanted & rated him innit

You have zero proof and are simply regurgitating the media spin for a player who only the dippers have a serious interest. The idea will be that they beat us to signing him because they are still mighty dippers with their "Istree".
He isn't and never will be as good as Stones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.