I saw the game and have now looked on several websites. My first thoughts have thus been confirmed by a myriad of sources. City won 3-1 so the second goal must have stood. That means the referee and his assistants saw nothing wrong with that goal so, in their opinion, it didn't go out.
As a cricket umpire once said, when a batsman claimed he should not have been given out; "look in the paper in the morning".
Wish it was further out.
Barm, Quinn, in.
The whole of the ball has to be over the line for it to be out. From behind, it looked out but the closer the angle of vision gets to the line itself, it's certainly far from conclusive and may well just be in. Certainly far less clear than the penalty we should have got in the first leg and the foul on Aguero before their goal tonight.
The whole of the ball has to be over the line for it to be out. From behind, it looked out but the closer the angle of vision gets to the line itself, it's certainly far from conclusive and may well just be in. Certainly far less clear than the penalty we should have got in the first leg and the foul on Aguero before their goal tonight.
He has apologised to KdB on twitter, saying he didn't realise he had a serious injury in the heat of the moment.And I know this happened afterwards but what a fucking **** that goalkeeper is for them bastards.
He was literally pulling up Kevin De Bruyne, he was in serious need of medical attention and he was doing this.
Vile human being.
the horrendous foul on de bruyne by the same player clearly stamps on de bruyne a left calf and pulls him backwill they show foul on sergio before everton's goal?
He has apologised to KdB on twitter, saying he didn't realise he had a serious injury in the heat of the moment.