levets said:
Disagree with all your points except 1. Yes he is better going forward than defending and the reason for that is simple... He joined Southampton as a left winger and was converted to a full back. So his natural game is to go forward.
Now.. on to his defending. One thing about Bridge is he NEVER dives in and gets skinned. A lot of the goals that were conceded and 'put down to Bridge' (wrongly), came from crosses that were put in from deep... (Stoke being the exception that I remember)... Is that not the role of the left Defensive midfielder? With barry in the midfield now, Bridge will shine.. He is a class act and is an England international.
As I've said earlier, Robby wrongly gets blamed for not covering when, really, that was Nigel's job.
But, yeah, you're right. Bridge never dives in and gets skinned. He stands off and gets skinned!! He gets treated like a step child in a LOT of games and although those moments don't all lead to goals, they lead to potential threats on goal. Ned has to cover that. Is that acceptable to you?
Fine, he can put in a cross, but that's not his first job, is it...?
Ash Cole's first job is defending, second is supporting the attack IF he has the opportunity, not the other way around. THAT is the reason why he took Bridge's position at the Rent Boys and England.