So glad in all our years of success you choose to postNo we don't. Our fans in the stadium were shite, let's be honest.
What was his other post, 'It was better at Main Road with Peter Swaylz' ?2 post in 11 years with one slagging off our fans, my rag-ometre is going off the the scales.
'Sniff Sniff'
So no women either?Families with kids are just as bad for the atmosphere as pensioners but at least that has the benefit of getting a new generation on board.
Oldies tend to confuse boisterousness with “scroteishness” but let’s have it right what anyone refers to when speaking of a good atmosphere is people belting songs out with passion - young men bring that..
Ok so because I want more young men there capable of creating an atmosphere I’m a misogynist, homophobe and racist too ? Poor comment that was mate.So no women either?
What about asian or gay fans? Any other you think should be banned for the glory hunters to come?
Being coked up ballooning on the concourse then being quite as a mouse once pitch side isn't great support.
It was 100%, it was as though they were plucky underdogs having a great day out against nasty City who have no fans, this was backed up by cute camera angles that seemed to show stands packed with Chelsea fans and shots of say a dozen or so seats with three or four City fans. I assumed BT got them piped in from Portuguese TV but whoever did they editing it was very pro Chelsea.I've just been talking to a guy at work that went, and he said there was plenty of noise from the city fans. From what I can gather, the BT screening was just purely chavski bias.
You don't like us do you!! The so called congratulatory replies are in response to the shite others are posting. Do you hate rag fans as much as you hate blues over 55 ?And can we stop with the self congratulatory pensioner led “great effort from the fans” “had to jump through hoops” “real hassle but i made the effort” “extortionate prices but I had to be there” narrative
It’s a fucking leisure activity, we go because we want to and we enjoy it. Nobody reads that kind of stuff and thinks “wow what an admirable fellow”
I've just been talking to a guy at work that went, and he said there was plenty of noise from the city fans. From what I can gather, the BT screening was just purely chavski bias.
The feed we got in Australia I was like that, very much so.It was 100%, it was as though they were plucky underdogs having a great day out against nasty City who have no fans, this was backed up by cute camera angles that seemed to show stands packed with Chelsea fans and shots of say a dozen or so seats with three or four City fans. I assumed BT got them piped in from Portuguese TV but whoever did they editing it was very pro Chelsea.