denislawsbackheel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 May 2008
- Messages
- 27,452
- Team supported
- We went to Rotherham…
Re: Blackburn run by Ganstas
Ganstas?
Heavy pasties perhaps.
Ganstas?
Heavy pasties perhaps.
rastus said:Not sure if previosly posted but came across this interesting Blog, it might explain quite a lot about Kean in a conspirtal way
http://stevekeanconspiracytheory.blogspot.com/
TCIB said:There was a thread on it but that link you posted is news to us matey, cheers.
Can't beat a good conspiracy.
Why did they sack big Sam then ?Damocles said:The Venkys made a commitment when he took over and said that they would not be the type of owners who would rashly sack a manager. They said that come hell or highwater, Kean would be there for five years.
So now they are getting bitched at for keeping their word; a trait I wish more owners would do.
that's an easy answer. for a manager who saw his side take it up the shitter 7 times at Trafford and didn't look at all bothered, the writing was on the wall, he was ordered to bend over by the fergiston and big Sam duelly obliged.bobmcfc said:Why did they sack big Sam then ?Damocles said:The Venkys made a commitment when he took over and said that they would not be the type of owners who would rashly sack a manager. They said that come hell or highwater, Kean would be there for five years.
So now they are getting bitched at for keeping their word; a trait I wish more owners would do.
mancunial said:that's an easy answer. for a manager who saw his side take it up the shitter 7 times at Trafford and didn't look at all bothered, the writing was on the wall, he was ordered to bend over by the fergiston and big Sam duelly obliged.bobmcfc said:Why did they sack big Sam then ?Damocles said:The Venkys made a commitment when he took over and said that they would not be the type of owners who would rashly sack a manager. They said that come hell or highwater, Kean would be there for five years.
So now they are getting bitched at for keeping their word; a trait I wish more owners would do.
danebanksheik said:mancunial said:that's an easy answer. for a manager who saw his side take it up the shitter 7 times at Trafford and didn't look at all bothered, the writing was on the wall, he was ordered to bend over by the fergiston and big Sam duelly obliged.bobmcfc said:Why did they sack big Sam then ?
how many will it be tomorrow after the pep talk phone call from whisky nose?
Just like United did for us. At least they stopped it at 4.Sky Blue Red said:danebanksheik said:mancunial said:that's an easy answer. for a manager who saw his side take it up the shitter 7 times at Trafford and didn't look at all bothered, the writing was on the wall, he was ordered to bend over by the fergiston and big Sam duelly obliged.
how many will it be tomorrow after the pep talk phone call from whisky nose?
Well they might as well bend over tommorow like they did with city earlier in the season. Fair is fair is it not?
The Future's Blue said:Just like United did for us.Sky Blue Red said:danebanksheik said:how many will it be tomorrow after the pep talk phone call from whisky nose?
Well they might as well bend over tommorow like they did with city earlier in the season. Fair is fair is it not?
I'm just wondering what loan signings you'll give them in Jan?Sky Blue Red said:The Future's Blue said:Just like United did for us. At least they stopped it at 4.Sky Blue Red said:Well they might as well bend over tommorow like they did with city earlier in the season. Fair is fair is it not?
Yes that would do nicely thanks.
I'm wondering what is the point of you being on here ? You have contributed nothing useful to any debate so far.Sky Blue Red said:Yes that would do nicely thanks.
[bigimg]http://members.roadfly.com/yelowbastard/baby.ban.him.jpg[/bigimg]cleavers said:I'm wondering what is the point of you being on here ? You have contributed nothing useful to any debate so far.Sky Blue Red said:Yes that would do nicely thanks.
If you fancy staying, I'd recomend you stop trying to be the WUM, we don't mind fans of other clubs on here, in fact we generally welcome 'away' fans who offer useful debate, even if they hide behind the pointless anonimity you do. So far you come across as a nothing more than a typical WUM rag.
jimharri said:[bigimg]http://members.roadfly.com/yelowbastard/baby.ban.him.jpg[/bigimg]cleavers said:I'm wondering what is the point of you being on here ? You have contributed nothing useful to any debate so far.Sky Blue Red said:Yes that would do nicely thanks.
If you fancy staying, I'd recomend you stop trying to be the WUM, we don't mind fans of other clubs on here, in fact we generally welcome 'away' fans who offer useful debate, even if they hide behind the pointless anonimity you do. So far you come across as a nothing more than a typical WUM rag.
cleavers said:For now I think we can await a reply, there must be a point for being here, if its to just be a WUM, then he/she can go, if they want to contribute then I'm happy for them to stay, but so far its just pointless posts having a sly dig at City. All far too raggish.
Sky Blue Red said:cleavers said:For now I think we can await a reply, there must be a point for being here, if its to just be a WUM, then he/she can go, if they want to contribute then I'm happy for them to stay, but so far its just pointless posts having a sly dig at City. All far too raggish.
Oh please tell me were I have had a go at city. People were talking crap so I was just talking crap back.
Lighten up boys have a bit of craic.
Oh and the user name is no worse than anyone elses on here, thanks.