Well done boss

Status
Not open for further replies.
I want it over because mp frustrates me and the football has become stale not to mention he repeats the same mistakes over and over again.This place is toxic around all the mp threads and it won't end till he goes.I don't mind shipping goals as long as we win the game,do you have peps win % for his time at Bayern by any chance?
I don't know his win %age at Bayern, but I can be pretty sure I'll be right when I say he won't match it when he's in the premier league, where Pellegrini has one of the best premier league win percentages, I know not so long ago he had the best win percentage. That's not to say Pep won't be a better manager, he will, but the stick Pellegrini gets is way out of perspective. Was the football stale against PSG, or Chelsea at the weekend ?
 
I don't know his win %age at Bayern, but I can be pretty sure I'll be right when I say he won't match it when he's in the premier league, where Pellegrini has one of the best premier league win percentages, I know not so long ago he had the best win percentage. That's not to say Pep won't be a better manager, he will, but the stick Pellegrini gets is way out of perspective. Was the football stale against PSG, or Chelsea at the weekend ?
The odd bit of pleasure does not excuse the rest of it
I do think pep will find it harder here than any where else he has been and i expect some bad times but it'll be exciting for sure and i can't wait for it to start
 
Non of the other managers have ever been employed in a similar role to this. He took the job as a caretaker. He was always in the job till Pep was available.
To argue otherwise is pointless and wrong. It's the first time to my knowledge a manager has been employed with his fate already sealed. Stats regarding anyother manager are totally irrelevant. Unless those managers were employed under identical or even similar circumstances. Name one manager who took a job knowing it was semi permenant.

I refer you to your initial response. You tell me Sorriano has written in his book about this happening at Barcelona. Txiki was at Barcelona, no?
So they have experienced this before, yet decided to repeat it? Under more difficult circumstances. Idiotic if you ask me.
As a DOF Txiki has overseen a squad growing old and complacent before? Seems like he's a bit shit to me then.

You argue we've gone backwards since Pellegrini, I could argue the same can be said of Txiki.
On field they have done nothing Cook and Marwood weren't doing.
Off field Sorriano is doing a great job as far as I can see.

The bringing up of youth is an interesting. The EDS seems to be utterly rudderless too. Viera gone, some ex rag put in charge of an EDS full of players way below standard. The true talent are still eligible for the u18's. I'm talking Faupala, Glendon, Horsefield, Barker, Ambrose et al.

The EDS seem to be in an almost identical situation to the first team. In limbo, waiting for the next chapter to start.

Youth should be introduced, it was creeping in. Garcia and Celina were making inroads, Iheanacho was in. Since Viera has gone, it's stopped. Where's the link between EDS and Pellegrini?

I agree, Pellegrini has plenty to answer for. But I think there's plenty of reasoning to be heard about massive fuck ups all centred around getting Guardiola. Players have been signed for him, plans put on hold for him. For three years we have been working towards a manager we didn't have. Pellegrini has been a caretaker. He's done a decent job. No more.

He's being asked to manager players bought for another manager. He's being asked to manage players with no future. There are huge holes in the squad. Again players with little or nothing left in way of motivation. For all we know he may have wanted a totally different side. From what we know Demichellis was his man. He's washed now, but I doubt Mangala or Otamendi will ever have the impact he did in our 2014 title run in.

Pellegrini should have done better, I won't argue that. He should have been more progressive in terms of tactics, he should have been more progressive in terms of youth. All I'm saying, he's not alone.

Pep will have a very hard job, what do we do if he sneaks in 4th, win a league cup and makes the CL semis? Fire him?
I won't judge Pep till he's through our door.

Yep you make some good points about Txiki, and I have always agreed that he has made a lot of mistakes. I think he's done a lot of good too, getting 12m for Jack Rodwell is a modern day miracle. Paying 12m for Fernando is a modern day scandal. We over paid for Mangala, but I personally think he's playing very well now and will improve even further if he is given the opportunity. Same with Otamendi, he's a talented player who needs the edges knocking off, needs to stay calm and stay on his feet.

I think the obvious fuck up is letting Yaya go on one season too long and not replacing him. I do think it was always the strategy to bring in Pogba last summer to learn under him, but for whatever reason we couldn't get it over the line. We've had to stick with Yaya for one season too many and it has possibly cost us in some games. As I've said before, personally I would concentrate pretty much all of our recruitment budget this season on centre midfielders. Yaya legs seem to have gone, Fernando is nowhere near fit for purpose, Delph is a useful squad player but not good enough to be starting every game, and Fernandinho is 31. Really we need 3 or 4 top draw central midfielders with energy, ambition and real quality on the ball. Gundogan is a fantastic start.

Some people think we need a whole new back 4, with two new centre halves. Personally I think you'll see a vast improvement in the back 4 and a vast improvement in the centre halves when we have 4 or 5 centre midfielders in the squad who are at the required level to provide them with protection. Our attacking players (with the exception of Navas and Bony) are brilliant, and if anyone can mould them in to an effective system, it's Guardiola.

I disagree about Txiki letting the squad get old and unambitious at Barca. For me that was a management issue, not a recruitment one. Guardiola essentially took the same squad that Rijkaard had finished 3rd with and made them treble winners in his first season. He didn't totally rip up the squad, throw out all of the old guard and bring in a whole new team. He bombed out Ronaldinho and Deco, brought in Henry and Keita, which was actually probably increasing the average age of the squad. What he did was totally reinvigorate the core players of a very talented squad. The key players in that team were Puyol, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi, Eto'o. Those players had all been there under Rijkaard, but had lost motivation and underachieved. Their dramatic upturn in form was very little to do with recruitment, and far more to do with outstanding management from Guardiola.

I'm not sure I understand your point about Pellegrini being a caretaker? He was given a three year contract initially, he's served all three years. That's more than double the average term for a manager in England. It's exactly the same term Guardiola served at Bayern, but he's not considered a caretaker. It's the same term Sorriano has said is most effective for managers at the top level. So what makes Pellegrini a caretaker? It's certainly not based on time served.

He was given 3 years and he's served all of them, so why would the fact he knew he was being replaced at the end of the 3 years affect him? Because he didn't feel loved? You've argued the players are professional and well paid enough to motivate themselves, well I'd argue Pellegrini on a 3 year contract, serving all 3 years and getting paid 4million a year, he's not got really got too much complain about.

I totally agree that Pellegrini is not solely to blame. Txiki made some big mistakes in recruitment, and the players have to take some of the responsibility too. Even bad luck with injuries has played a part. But the proof will be in the pudding, my guess is that next year we will have the same core squad of players as this year. There will be some tweaks no doubt as there is every year, but I would be stunned if Guardiola doesn't get much more out of the very same players that Pellegrini has so clearly underachieved with.
 
I don't know his win %age at Bayern, but I can be pretty sure I'll be right when I say he won't match it when he's in the premier league, where Pellegrini has one of the best premier league win percentages, I know not so long ago he had the best win percentage. That's not to say Pep won't be a better manager, he will, but the stick Pellegrini gets is way out of perspective. Was the football stale against PSG, or Chelsea at the weekend ?
We've been shockingly poor in a lot of games this season. We've been boring to watch. I won't join in with the slating the guy, but his time is up. I don't care for win percentages or other such stats, I just know what I'm watching, and at times it's turgid.
 
We've been shockingly poor in a lot of games this season. We've been boring to watch. I won't join in with the slating the guy, but his time is up. I don't care for win percentages or other such stats, I just know what I'm watching, and at times it's turgid.
I don't particularly disagree, it's just the black or white view of him that annoys and descriptions of him being totally incompetent. There are a lot worse people out there we could have had for the last 3 years. What if we'd had Mourinho and been left where Chelsea are.
 
I want it over because mp frustrates me and the football has become stale not to mention he repeats the same mistakes over and over again.This place is toxic around all the mp threads and it won't end till he goes.I don't mind shipping goals as long as we win the game,do you have peps win % for his time at Bayern by any chance?

In the CL it's not much better than Pellegrini's at City. Despite being a top seed every season. Pep's this season in 70% or 7/10. Pellegrini's is 6/10.
We haven't had the pleasure of Olympiacos or Dynamo Zagreb though.
Had we swapped Juventus for Dynamo Zagreb I'm sure Pellegrini would be enjoying an equal or better win percentage.

Never said Pep wasn't better did I? His team's in the CL ship goals for fun is what I said.
 
Pellegrini has some admirable attributes that should see him secure a decent job without much trouble - he's likeable, uncontroversial, reserved and statesmanlike. Most clubs would want those attributes in a manager, a handful might deem him to be lacking in passion, personality, or dare I say, a little too old.
He was allegedly tasked with 5 trophies in 5 seasons and he's managed 3 (potentially 4) in 3 seasons. We've also progressed in Europe. How much is down to him is difficult to say, but you can't blame him for the bad things without attributing the good things to him.

If I could choose between Mancini and Pellegrini, I'd choose Mancini - but that's just me. Pros and cons to both.

Personally I don't feel we've progressed over the last 3 years. Some will argue that CL is an indication of progression, but I believe the rub of the green finally went our way. There's no denying some very good performances in this campaign though. Credit where it's due.

I never like to see a manager leaving, not really, as it's almost always preceded by a feeling of 'time for change' brought about by perceived poor performance. In our rare case, it's the opportunity to capture the world's most sought-after manager, so either you feel Pellegrini's been poor and time for a change, or he's not been poor and is losing his job anyway.

I think he's had his favourites, but I doubt he's had autonomy over transfers. I'd go so far as to say he's probably had a minority say in transfers (but that's pure speculation on my part).

I'd give him a score of 7/10 with the comment "he was a long term 'interim' manager, met expectations but never exceeded them".
 
In the CL it's not much better than Pellegrini's at City. Despite being a top seed every season. Pep's this season in 70% or 7/10. Pellegrini's is 6/10.
We haven't had the pleasure of Olympiacos or Dynamo Zagreb though.

Never said Pep wasn't better did I? His team's in the CL ship goals for fun is what I said.
Thanks for the info,i wasn't disputing what you said i was just interested in the stats
 
I think the problems run a bit deeper than just the Newcastle game mate.

I respect your view if you think Pellegrini has done a decent job. His win percentage is certainly fairly impressive. But let's be honest, you'd expect Glenn Roeder to win more than he lost with this group of players.

I think the only way to judge a manager is relative to what he has at his disposal. Look at Eddie Howe at Bournmouth, relative to his resources at Bournmouth he's done an incredible job. Louis Long Baal has a much better win percentage this season, but would you say in relative terms he's done a better job? I certainly wouldn't.

With our squad of players we should be challenging for the Premier League title every season for the last 5 seasons. Of course we can't win it every year, but we should certainly be going close. So when you look at his three years, first year we won it, great. Second year we came second by 11 points and really were never even in the race once winter was over. This season we are in a real fight for FOURTH place. Third at absolute best, we could finish as low as 6th, and there's 4 games to go!

The last two seasons have been a rank underachievement in the league relative to the talent of our squad. Yes he's got a good win percentage, but with our squad, he should have a good win percentage. We have not mounted a serious title challenge in his last two seasons, and if you think that is a decent job with this squad of players then maybe we have different views about when 'decent' looks like.

I read quite often on here that with our squad he should have won most things on offer. Yes he has his moments, but does anyone else agree that our squad is not as good as many think it is? Players age and deteriorate, why do so many on here feel ours are exempt from this.
 
I certainly didn't turn the tone to a patronising one. The point of my post was a plea to show more respect to the man.

That Glenn Roeder comment is right out of the 'arry Redknapp school of thought.

And why you're quoting Grant's Chelsea record I don't know, we are discussing Premier League records. And again I'm not suggesting Pellegrini is a very impressive manager.

I didn't suggest it was you who turned the tone patronising.

I assume your issue was the "lambs" line, well I was actually poking fun at another poster who had used that line, so it wasn't aimed at you.

I'm not really sure what the 'arry Redknapp school of thought is that you're referring to?

You don't know why I'm quoting Avram Grant's Chelsea record? I'm not sure which bit you don't get? You were quoting Pellegrini's win percentage as some kind of evidence that he's a good manager. I'm quoting Avram Grant's win percentage to you, which is better than Pellegrini's, as evidence that a good win percentage is not conclusive evidence that someone is a good manager.

Any statistic should be taken in context.

Avram Grant having a good win percentage at Chelsea is not conclusive evidence that he is a good manager, or one "worthy of respect". He took over a very good team, and he was a pretty limited manager. It's fair to assume his impressive win percentage was more down to the talented squad at his disposal than his managerial acumen.

Similarly, Pellegrini has a good win percentage with City, but does that show conclusive evidence that he is a good manager? I don't think it does. He took over a top team and spend a shit load of money, more than any of his rivals. He should have a good win percentage. It's expected.

Brian Clough took provincial Second Division Nottingham Forest to back to back European Cup wins. His win percentage isn't as good as Avram Grant's. It isn't as good as Pellegrini's. Do you think it is then fair to assume Brian Clough wasn't as good a manager as Avram Grant or Pellegrini? Personally, I do not.

Statistics, win percentages, are fine, but they need context.
 
Yeah that's about right. Makes me chuckle. The stats, they don't really marry up with the characterisations that the gobshites on the internet keep making up about Pellegrini. His win ratio is like our defensive record under him, misrepresented, misunderstood, and regularly lied about by the aforementioned gobshites to have a go at him.

I see the new way to show their disdain is to just post "tick tock". The irony is utterly lost on them. Poor lambs.
Funny little man. Glad you still read my posts.
If you can point out the irony of "tick tock" I'm all ears.
 
A decent win percentage means jack shit when you are spending £100s of millions each season and failing to muster a title challenge.
 
I didn't suggest it was you who turned the tone patronising.

I assume your issue was the "lambs" line, well I was actually poking fun at another poster who had used that line, so it wasn't aimed at you.

I'm not really sure what the 'arry Redknapp school of thought is that you're referring to?

You don't know why I'm quoting Avram Grant's Chelsea record? I'm not sure which bit you don't get? You were quoting Pellegrini's win percentage as some kind of evidence that he's a good manager. I'm quoting Avram Grant's win percentage to you, which is better than Pellegrini's, as evidence that a good win percentage is not conclusive evidence that someone is a good manager.

Any statistic should be taken in context.

Avram Grant having a good win percentage at Chelsea is not conclusive evidence that he is a good manager, or one "worthy of respect". He took over a very good team, and he was a pretty limited manager. It's fair to assume his impressive win percentage was more down to the talented squad at his disposal than his managerial acumen.

Similarly, Pellegrini has a good win percentage with City, but does that show conclusive evidence that he is a good manager? I don't think it does. He took over a top team and spend a shit load of money, more than any of his rivals. He should have a good win percentage. It's expected.

Brian Clough took provincial Second Division Nottingham Forest to back to back European Cup wins. His win percentage isn't as good as Avram Grant's. It isn't as good as Pellegrini's. Do you think it is then fair to assume Brian Clough wasn't as good a manager as Avram Grant or Pellegrini? Personally, I do not.

Statistics, win percentages, are fine, but they need context.

There's no point here mate, I've repeatedly said why I quoted his win percentage, you continually refuse to acknowledge why and suggest I did it for another reason, let's leave it there.
 
Here is the issue right now karen. Some didn't like Mancini and his football, i was one of them but never did it stoop to the level of bile and vitriol we are seeing on here regarding Pellegrini, never.

By all means not like the bloke and comment on his tactics or lack of them and state you cant wait for him to go, that's fair enough.

What isnt fair enough is the childish name calling and downright disrespectful and offensive way in which some feel the need to refer to our manager.

Nobody is trying to stifle feeling or debate, just the tone of the language being used.


Spot on.
 
A decent win percentage means jack shit when you are spending £100s of millions each season and failing to muster a title challenge.
I have to agree. We are seeking trophies, not percentages. I'd rather win a league with a 40% win ratio than not win it with an 80% one.

Missing the point. I posted his win percentage to show that he's not as bad as some are making out. It wasn't an attempt to laud him.

The reason I did this is because I think he deserves more respect than he's being shown.
 
The slating of Pellegrini is more an indication of fan frustration and disappointment than genuine dislike of the man. It's a similar situation with players. It might not be right, but it's pretty typical phenomenon at most clubs.
We have been excited by the spending and stadium expansion, but our league performances have curbed our enthusiasm significantly. Champions League has been pleasing though. I don't know what to make of the League Cup win - it seems to have been forgotten, but it certainly doesn't seem to have created any more optimism.
For me personally it just feels like a rather nondescript season. Just when I start to get excited, we put in a really poor performance and it kills the mood, and then I look at the league table and it's there in black and white - we are good, but not that good, and certainly not as good I hoped.
 
Last edited:
I don't particularly disagree, it's just the black or white view of him that annoys and descriptions of him being totally incompetent. There are a lot worse people out there we could have had for the last 3 years. What if we'd had Mourinho and been left where Chelsea are.
He's not incompetent. Anyone who suggests that is just wrong. You don't win the league (the best league in the world apparently), win two domestic cups and get to the CL semi final by being incompetent.
 
Yep you make some good points about Txiki, and I have always agreed that he has made a lot of mistakes. I think he's done a lot of good too, getting 12m for Jack Rodwell is a modern day miracle. Paying 12m for Fernando is a modern day scandal. We over paid for Mangala, but I personally think he's playing very well now and will improve even further if he is given the opportunity. Same with Otamendi, he's a talented player who needs the edges knocking off, needs to stay calm and stay on his feet.

I think the obvious fuck up is letting Yaya go on one season too long and not replacing him. I do think it was always the strategy to bring in Pogba last summer to learn under him, but for whatever reason we couldn't get it over the line. We've had to stick with Yaya for one season too many and it has possibly cost us in some games. As I've said before, personally I would concentrate pretty much all of our recruitment budget this season on centre midfielders. Yaya legs seem to have gone, Fernando is nowhere near fit for purpose, Delph is a useful squad player but not good enough to be starting every game, and Fernandinho is 31. Really we need 3 or 4 top draw central midfielders with energy, ambition and real quality on the ball. Gundogan is a fantastic start.

Some people think we need a whole new back 4, with two new centre halves. Personally I think you'll see a vast improvement in the back 4 and a vast improvement in the centre halves when we have 4 or 5 centre midfielders in the squad who are at the required level to provide them with protection. Our attacking players (with the exception of Navas and Bony) are brilliant, and if anyone can mould them in to an effective system, it's Guardiola.

I disagree about Txiki letting the squad get old and unambitious at Barca. For me that was a management issue, not a recruitment one. Guardiola essentially took the same squad that Rijkaard had finished 3rd with and made them treble winners in his first season. He didn't totally rip up the squad, throw out all of the old guard and bring in a whole new team. He bombed out Ronaldinho and Deco, brought in Henry and Keita, which was actually probably increasing the average age of the squad. What he did was totally reinvigorate the core players of a very talented squad. The key players in that team were Puyol, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi, Eto'o. Those players had all been there under Rijkaard, but had lost motivation and underachieved. Their dramatic upturn in form was very little to do with recruitment, and far more to do with outstanding management from Guardiola.

I'm not sure I understand your point about Pellegrini being a caretaker? He was given a three year contract initially, he's served all three years. That's more than double the average term for a manager in England. It's exactly the same term Guardiola served at Bayern, but he's not considered a caretaker. It's the same term Sorriano has said is most effective for managers at the top level. So what makes Pellegrini a caretaker? It's certainly not based on time served.

He was given 3 years and he's served all of them, so why would the fact he knew he was being replaced at the end of the 3 years affect him? Because he didn't feel loved? You've argued the players are professional and well paid enough to motivate themselves, well I'd argue Pellegrini on a 3 year contract, serving all 3 years and getting paid 4million a year, he's not got really got too much complain about.

I totally agree that Pellegrini is not solely to blame. Txiki made some big mistakes in recruitment, and the players have to take some of the responsibility too. Even bad luck with injuries has played a part. But the proof will be in the pudding, my guess is that next year we will have the same core squad of players as this year. There will be some tweaks no doubt as there is every year, but I would be stunned if Guardiola doesn't get much more out of the very same players that Pellegrini has so clearly underachieved with.


He was the only manager I can remember in football history employed with his replacement already in discussion about the job. That is the definition of a caretaker.

He has only ever been a caretaker. He hasn't signed the players he wanted. He's been handed players bought with a future manager in mind.

To me Pellegrini liked two strikers, painfully obvious. Obvious to a fault. Yet, the manager who clearly likes two strikers is left with 1. 2 if you count Bony. An 18 year old is always a gamble. Both he and Mancini, even Ferguson for that matter have insisted you need four in the PL. Which manager is famous for wanting just 1 striker and often plays without a striker? Yup. Guardiola. So, does two senior strikers sound ideal for a manager who likes 4 or a manager that likes 1 or non?

He favours two centre mids. City have left him hamstrung in this department too.
Nothing I have seen from him would indicate Sterling was signed with Pellegrini in mind.

He has been hamstrung by Txiki and the impending Gaurdiola from day one. He was only ever here till Pep was made available.
Year 1, put out Mancini's fires. Done and won the league.
Year 2. Improve on a PL win and build or work in a holistic way. He failed. As did Txiki, Fernando & Mangala...
Year 3. Keep the seat warm for a manager he and all the players knew was impending. Work with players signed for another coach. For me, he should have won the league. I beieve he would of with less injuries. He has overachieved in the CL.

Imagine the havoc Mancini would have caused had he not been able to pick his transfer targets. We don't need to, he called Marwood out in public.

Pellegrini's set up is simple and uncomplicated. Two energetic midfielders. Attacking full backs. Wide men that like to cut in and rightly or wrongly two out and out strikers.
We've signed players for another manager, another system, a system the current manager doesn't use. We have as litterally as possible asked a Leopard to change his spots.

To judge a manager in these circumstances is very difficult as I've never come across this scenario before. I doubt many have.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top