Well done Stoke

StatesideStokie said:
svennis pennis said:
The first half was a disgrace to the game.

Stoke keep the ball in the air. Every set piece takes a minute and then is hoofed into the gods. A team that plays for throw ins and then takes another minute for Delap to dry the ball and throw it for a line out. It takes the piss.

I would love us to buy Delap to serve half time hotdogs american style. Launching them to the back rows. Delap, a footballer more likely to get tennis elbow than a hamstring injury. Shocking but I congratulate their fans for putting up with it. Saying that, they deserve each other for encouraging it, celebrating throw ins like a goal and simultaneously going oooooooooooOOOOOOOOO as Delap takes a fucking throw in.

its a fucking freak show. Every game at the shittania when a top club goes there is billed like a 19th century cabaged circus mutant fighting a gladiator. Their fans think its because its the contrast in styles. Its not, its because your team is so fucking ridiculous that you cant help but watch as the mutant somehow causes carnage and reduces its opposition to a game of head tennis against a team of basketball players.


Did you actually watch the game?? Take the throw ins out of the equation and Delap was still man of the match.

Deluded, you play like fcuking wimbledon simple as shite football... yes it's effective for you but fcuking wank!!
 
Well didnt go tonight due to there was no way I was watching Joke 3 times in 2 weeks (will go in Cup)

I hate going there due to they just play like Wimbledon used to but have more physical players than WFC used to have. Still laughing after Richards dive but also the dive that Fuller did then got Barry booked.
 
BTH said:
StatesideStokie said:
We defended superbly, especially when we went down to ten men, and you'll get no apologies from us for that.

Please don't try and kid yourself that you dominated the game because you clearly didn't. We murdered you first half, and we never stopped having a go even when we went down to ten men. What did you want us to do, let you walk it into an empty net?

Slowly but surely, you are descending to levels of delusion usually frequented by the Rags and Chelski.

I don't think I'm "descending to levels of delusion usually frequented by the Rags and Chelski" at all, just because I'm pointing out the way you play, any more than I'm kidding myself that we dominated the game. I'm not and we didn't. However, your tactics are very limited; long throw-ins and your players writhing around in pretend agony as soon as anyone goes near them; they were particularly embarrassing last Saturday. It's hardly a huge criticism, more of an observation. West Brom excelled in this former tactic, although they tended to put 10 men behind the ball... and they still went down.

Anyway, congratulations on your informative post; after all, it can't be easy to type when you've got 12 fingers competing for keyboard space.



12 fingers maybe, but if your two fucking eyes are suggesting that West Brom were a long ball team who played with ten men behind the ball, you need to see an optician mate.


And as for rolling around on the floor at the first sign of contact, perhaps if Glen Whelan had lived up to your completely inaccurate observation, Viera would have been rightly sent off.

I used to have a lot of time for Man City fans, but I'm starting to think the gloryhunting wankstains usually associated with your neighbours have suddenly jumped ship, because some of the bollocks I'm reading here is laughable.
 
f--kin hate man u - all proper stoke fans do

but you c--ts are really gettin on my t---s

champions league - u know the rest ha ha ha
 
StatesideStokie said:
BTH said:
I don't think I'm "descending to levels of delusion usually frequented by the Rags and Chelski" at all, just because I'm pointing out the way you play, any more than I'm kidding myself that we dominated the game. I'm not and we didn't. However, your tactics are very limited; long throw-ins and your players writhing around in pretend agony as soon as anyone goes near them; they were particularly embarrassing last Saturday. It's hardly a huge criticism, more of an observation. West Brom excelled in this former tactic, although they tended to put 10 men behind the ball... and they still went down.

Anyway, congratulations on your informative post; after all, it can't be easy to type when you've got 12 fingers competing for keyboard space.



12 fingers maybe, but if your two fucking eyes are suggesting that West Brom were a long ball team who played with ten men behind the ball, you need to see an optician mate.


And as for rolling around on the floor at the first sign of contact, perhaps if Glen Whelan had lived up to your completely inaccurate observation, Viera would have been rightly sent off.

I used to have a lot of time for Man City fans, but I'm starting to think the gloryhunting wankstains usually associated with your neighbours have suddenly jumped ship, because some of the bollocks I'm reading here is laughable.

Still the same fans, you know the ones who were there in the 3rd tier of english football 30 thousand not bad that is it r kid?
 
Can we throw the stoke fan off the board??

Lets get ready for the throw. ooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 
How sad are you lot you get into the prem kicking lumps out of everyone and cheer throw ins. You think cos you make a lot of noise you are great fans? When the novelty wears of you will all fuck off and take them wankers from Hull with you.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.