Having seen Manchester City play for the past three years under Pellegrini, the thing that strikes me the most is that we actually won a Premier League under him.
I guess every manager becomes stale at his club and among his player within a few years of his employment. A decade ago, maybe that period of effectiveness was 5-6 years. In today's age, it has probably dropped to 3-4 years.
But what is most bewildering with our gaffer is that he seems to commit the most naive of errors in judgement.
What possible reason would compel him to play Bony instead of Iheanacho? Every man and his dog can see that the team plays with more fluidity with Nacho than with Bony. It's not as if this game's first 60 minutes were the first time we saw as evidence for that.
What possible reason would compel him to play Aguero till he had to limp off with a knock? Substituting him at 20 minutes after we had scored the second vital goal, is something i cannot understand. We have the most amazing opportunity to get through to the semifinals of the Champions League(*knocks on wood*), proving a massive point to all the f***ing naysayers. And then we had to literally shoot ourselves in the foot in such a foolhardy manner?! Typical City or just sheer ineptness?! Is that because he thought that Aguero might bag another goal and seal the win? Well then give him help in the form of Iheanacho to begin with, not the ineffective Bony!!
There were some weird decisions taken by him today. I like the man a lot. As a gent, he is right up there with the best and there are many aspects of his conduct that I would like to inculcate in my own life. But some of his decisions, or shall we say, non-decisions really wind me up.
At least he got the substitutions right. But we got lucky at the end there. So more often than not, this season, we have ended up squeaking through. Having said that, I'd rather squeak through than not get through at all. Plus, wasn't Nasri class?!