oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Have to agree with you r30.Doesn`t appear to be getting any better but I suppose only real game would show.If I have to be honest he would only be 4th,assuming we go for Sanchez so for me its a no brainer.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
West Ham interested in Iheanacho
- Thread starter ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
20m is great money
£20m would be good money.
Completely agree.
He doesn't look like he has any future under Pep, especially now we have Jesus.
£20m is a decent deal if you ask me.
£20m would be a mistake. With several clubs competing for him, it's pretty much assured he could walk into their teams, particularly West Ham. We all know how talented he is, the record he has, and that with a full season of playing every week, he could quite easily get 15-20 goals at a club like West Ham.
We could sell him for £20m, or do the smart thing and loan him out for a season before selling him for £35m next summer - or even keeping him if he improves in key areas.
He's got a long contract, there's no need to rush into selling him permanently.
Doesn`t appear to be getting any better.
Well he's only started 1 game since October, and he got sacrificed at half time because of Fernandinho getting himself sent off.
Hard for any player to improve when they don't play.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
If all parties can agree to it without doubt that's the ideal scenario£20m would be a mistake. With several clubs competing for him, it's pretty much assured he could walk into their teams, particularly West Ham. We all know how talented he is, the record he has, and that with a full season of playing every week, he could quite easily get 15-20 goals at a club like West Ham.
We could sell him for £20m, or do the smart thing and loan him out for a season before selling him for £35m next summer - or even keeping him if he improves in key areas.
He's got a long contract, there's no need to rush into selling him permanently.
theres only one carlito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 2,316
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 1980
Real Madrid had a similar situation with Samuel Eto. 4 years after loaning him to different clubs he joined Mallorca 4.5mill broke records then went to Barca 24mill, Perez tried his best to RESIGN him to Real! His stock had risen that much. The rest is history. I would Loan Kelechi out and watch him develop, I believe given time and Games he will become a very very good player. I wouldn't sell him outright. Not yet. Time is everything for young players.
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
20 million is a bargain, should be asking for more.
It's amazing. 6 months ago people on here were saying how brilliant he was and Rashford was nowt in comparison.
Now people say he is not all that.
I actually think he is the best finisher at the club. If Raheem had half the composure he would be a world beater.
I can see that he doesn't have the all round game of Jesus, Sane or even the new Kun, but surely he can improve that area. He is very young.
So for me a loan spell, he deserves a chance to play.
Now people say he is not all that.
I actually think he is the best finisher at the club. If Raheem had half the composure he would be a world beater.
I can see that he doesn't have the all round game of Jesus, Sane or even the new Kun, but surely he can improve that area. He is very young.
So for me a loan spell, he deserves a chance to play.
Charlesfarsbar
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 1,559
Imagine we were looking at signing a new up and coming forward from another premier league club , only 20 years of age
that player had played less than 60 games , the majority from the bench but scored 21 goals
how much do you think we would have to pay for this player - £20m?
we would be looking at £30m+ , which is what we should be asking for
I would loan him out only , he will score goals wherever he goes, his value will appreciate over the season while he's banging them in
In a couple of seasons he could be worth £60m, we could then sell him on or bring him back to replace Aguero
that player had played less than 60 games , the majority from the bench but scored 21 goals
how much do you think we would have to pay for this player - £20m?
we would be looking at £30m+ , which is what we should be asking for
I would loan him out only , he will score goals wherever he goes, his value will appreciate over the season while he's banging them in
In a couple of seasons he could be worth £60m, we could then sell him on or bring him back to replace Aguero
Real Madrid had a similar situation with Samuel Eto. 4 years after loaning him to different clubs he joined Mallorca 4.5mill broke records then went to Barca 24mill, Perez tried his best to RESIGN him to Real! His stock had risen that much. The rest is history. I would Loan Kelechi out and watch him develop, I believe given time and Games he will become a very very good player. I wouldn't sell him outright. Not yet. Time is everything for young players.
Lukaku is a similar tale of caution. Chelsea are going to ending up paying £60m for Everton to develop him for 2 seasons.
sdm
Well-Known Member
20 up front. Plus add ons .apps, goals , cup wins etc etc. Call that 25 all in. First refusal on a transfer back at 30 mill. Everyones happy.
It's amazing. 6 months ago people on here were saying how brilliant he was and Rashford was nowt in comparison.
Now people say he is not all that.
I actually think he is the best finisher at the club. If Raheem had half the composure he would be a world beater.
I can see that he doesn't have the all round game of Jesus, Sane or even the new Kun, but surely he can improve that area. He is very young.
So for me a loan spell, he deserves a chance to play.
Nobody is calling him bad. Just saying that he doesn't suit the current playstyle. And getting 20m £ wouldn't be bad business with the important window coming.
uwe rosler 28
Well-Known Member
20m is top money take it!!!!!
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
It's amazing. 6 months ago people on here were saying how brilliant he was and Rashford was nowt in comparison.
Now people say he is not all that.
I actually think he is the best finisher at the club. If Raheem had half the composure he would be a world beater.
I can see that he doesn't have the all round game of Jesus, Sane or even the new Kun, but surely he can improve that area. He is very young.
So for me a loan spell, he deserves a chance to play.
I'm with you on this.
he might not be ready yet but he needs a season playing regularly in the top flight before we decide he isnt for us and if that season proves he does have what it takes then he comes back and does a job for us.
The lad knows where the back of the net is and that kind of skill costs a lot of money these days so why let him go on the chap and why before we have seen if he can do it for a full season at this level?
loan him to west ham or whoever but lets not be too hasty in wanting rid.
west ham maybe will have a new manager and mancini could be the manager so links to city and zabba could be going there so maybe a loan
we should not sell him just yet and use the loan option to see if we can get more if he scores alot of goals
we should not sell him just yet and use the loan option to see if we can get more if he scores alot of goals
theres only one carlito
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Mar 2010
- Messages
- 2,316
- Team supported
- Manchester City since 1980
Your quite correct, however for me, Kelechi has shown more quality at this stage than Lukaku ever did at Chelsea. Young Players need time and confidence with Games under their belt to develop properly. Like Romelu at Everton, Kelechi needs his Everton and we must keep hold of his registration. He will definitely be a great player in time.Lukaku is a similar tale of caution. Chelsea are going to ending up paying £60m for Everton to develop him for 2 seasons.
I honestly can't see him getting a look in over the next season or two.
We should definitely be looking at a sale with add-on's and maybe even a sell on clause of at around 25%, or a possible buy back clause if he progresses.
There is always a possibility of a new rising star evolving in the same time he would be away from the club.
The money could go towards Mbappe and a possible trade with Enes Unal thrown in, that would then make Mbappe's price look more attractive at around £60m - £70m, suggesting that Mbappe is worth around £100m (according to Monaco's valuation).
Neither Kalechi nor Enes would ever be in front of Aguero, Jesus, Mbappe or possibly even Sanchez, whichever way we decide to go.
I'd happily go for this outcome.
We should definitely be looking at a sale with add-on's and maybe even a sell on clause of at around 25%, or a possible buy back clause if he progresses.
There is always a possibility of a new rising star evolving in the same time he would be away from the club.
The money could go towards Mbappe and a possible trade with Enes Unal thrown in, that would then make Mbappe's price look more attractive at around £60m - £70m, suggesting that Mbappe is worth around £100m (according to Monaco's valuation).
Neither Kalechi nor Enes would ever be in front of Aguero, Jesus, Mbappe or possibly even Sanchez, whichever way we decide to go.
I'd happily go for this outcome.
Jazzman
Well-Known Member
Agreed. Would rather loan him out than sell. He might come back next year as one of the leading goal scorers of the PL£20m would be a mistake. With several clubs competing for him, it's pretty much assured he could walk into their teams, particularly West Ham. We all know how talented he is, the record he has, and that with a full season of playing every week, he could quite easily get 15-20 goals at a club like West Ham.
We could sell him for £20m, or do the smart thing and loan him out for a season before selling him for £35m next summer - or even keeping him if he improves in key areas.
He's got a long contract, there's no need to rush into selling him permanently.
City_Sean
Well-Known Member
I'm with you on this.
he might not be ready yet but he needs a season playing regularly in the top flight before we decide he isnt for us and if that season proves he does have what it takes then he comes back and does a job for us.
The lad knows where the back of the net is and that kind of skill costs a lot of money these days so why let him go on the chap and why before we have seen if he can do it for a full season at this level?
loan him to west ham or whoever but lets not be too hasty in wanting rid.
I'd try to sell him with a relatively cheap buyback clause. Similar to the Rulli deal.
sdm
Well-Known Member
If he helped them with goals ,cup wins, etc etc and was looking a top drawer player then 30 back to us would be great money.Everyone, except maybe the buying club.
If we didnt want him back then it is open market (forgot to add that bit) and they could get whatever they wanted for him.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.