What are you watching on youtube right now?


It's a longish one at the 90 minutes, but makes for some interesting viewing, regardless of what side of the fence you sit on. A large auditer turn out, featuring the families favourite Fred, DJE Media, Marti Blagborough, MKR Audits, My Brakes Dont Work, Ryan Rampage and many more. It's just like a Christmas special : )
 
Last edited:
A certain section of society will hate him for this, call him a far right nutter and disregard the concerns of everyday people.

Fair play to him.
A certain section of society would also say he is talking bollocks to whip up further anger / hatred.


 
A certain section of society would also say he is talking bollocks to whip up further anger / hatred.



As if on cue.
 
Martin Zero’s latest, going into a culvert in Hollinwood, near to where the Roxy was, and finding the source of the Moston Brook.

His culvert films are always the best.

Hmm. Very interesting. When I was a nipper, (late 60's) I lived in Hollinwood and we would cut under the rd, (possibly Hollins rd. Not sure. It's so different now) through a tunnel to get over to the Roxy for the sat. matinee.
 
A certain section of society would also say he is talking bollocks to whip up further anger / hatred.



The daft thing is the government are actually in the process of being sued for seizing mobile phones from asylum seekers (as in their own devices) because it left them with no way to contact family or legal representatives.

Also a brief google search will bring up a load of charities whose whole purpose for existing is to provide refugees with donated mobile phones. Weird how that’s necessary given they get a choice between Samsung and iPhones fresh off the boat.

This whole rumour about phones started because during COVID face-to-face meetings with immigration officials weren’t possible so they temporarily gave people phones to conduct those meetings and then reclaimed them when the process was over. This is no longer the case.
 
As if on cue.
What is?

I watched a minute or two, and thought,

“Sounds odd that the government would give people the choice between an IPhone or a Samsung. I better do the tiniest research to verify it”

And it turned out it was bollocks - and I saw the evidence quite quickly.

Or I could believe anything, anyone says, and get angry.
 
What is?

I watched a minute or two, and thought,

“Sounds odd that the government would give people the choice between an IPhone or a Samsung. I better do the tiniest research to verify it”

And it turned out it was bollocks - and I saw the evidence quite quickly.

Or I could believe anything, anyone says, and get angry.

Anecdotal evidence not good enough for you then? You dismiss it out of hand because it doesn't support your narrative.

It hasn't turned out to be bollocks, just because someone says something that supports you it's all true?

FFS.
 
Anecdotal evidence not good enough for you then? You dismiss it out of hand because it doesn't support your narrative.

It hasn't turned out to be bollocks, just because someone says something that supports you it's all true?

FFS.
No, I dismiss it out of hand from unknown people in videos, when there is evidence to the contrary.

Do you accept anyone’s anecdotal evidence as fact?

Do you know who he is (other than “ex-employee”)? Do you know if he has an axe to grind? Who employs him now? Etc. It’s the basics of identifying fake news.
 
No, I dismiss it out of hand from unknown people in videos, when there is evidence to the contrary.

Do you accept anyone’s anecdotal evidence as fact?

Do you know who he is (other than “ex-employee”)? Do you know if he has an axe to grind? Who employs him now? Etc. It’s the basics of identifying fake news.

You seem to think it's bollocks how about you make it happen and bring some evidence to prove it isn't true other than someone i AGREE WITH SAYS IT'S FALSE.

I did say on my initial posts that the brain-dead would appear umming and ahhing and it appeared I was right.
 
You seem to think it's bollocks how about you make it happen and bring some evidence to prove it isn't true other than someone i AGREE WITH SAYS IT'S FALSE.

I did say on my initial posts that the brain-dead would appear umming and ahhing and it appeared I was right.
I supplied evidence in my original post.

One from an official government (.gov.uk) website.

What more evidence would you like to see?

Or are you convinced beyond doubt that anecdotal evidence from an unknown person is factual?
 
I supplied evidence in my original post.

One from an official government (.gov.uk) website.

What more evidence would you like to see?

Or are you convinced beyond doubt that anecdotal evidence from an unknown person is factual?

The govt have admitted that they have spent £4 million on mobile phones for these illegals, the evidence you supplied means nothing.

I'm not going to derail this thread arguing the toss with someone who can't make head nor tails of the truth.

Because someone who agreed with me online I say it's true :)
 
The govt have admitted that they have spent £4 million on mobile phones for these illegals, the evidence you supplied means nothing.

I'm not going to derail this thread arguing the toss with someone who can't make head nor tails of the truth.

Because someone who agreed with me online I say it's true :)
I appreciate you trying to wrap the debate up, but can you point to where the government has said they spent £4m on just mobile phones please?

I can see they did over 3 years on phones, amongst other things during Lockdowns etc.

But going back to this bloke on the video, in 2025 talking about it, and claiming it as fact as of today? Seems a little disingenuous?
 
I appreciate you trying to wrap the debate up, but can you point to where the government has said they spent £4m on just mobile phones please?

I can see they did over 3 years on phones, amongst other things during Lockdowns etc.

But going back to this bloke on the video, in 2025 talking about it, and claiming it as fact as of today? Seems a little disingenuous?
The information is online, just google it. The government even give reasons for it. I wouldn't trust governments with any truth after Hillsborough, grenfel and the rape gangs both religious and establishment.
 
Last edited:


Loved Big Mal pronouncing Ajax like we pronounce it, he couldn't care less how they pronounced it :)

What a rogues gallery there was in that studio though, whoever would have thought that the best way to improve the English game would be just to get rid of most of the English players.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top