IcriedwhenTueartleft
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 May 2011
- Messages
- 15,719
If we were lucky enough to get Grealish & Kane or Haaland in the summer I’d be feeling pretty confident about next season, to put it mildly.
We did throw the fa cup and that gave Chelsea more confidence last night.In fairness we threw the fa cup this year and by we I mean Pep. Tiredness wasn't the reason we lost. Pep needs the domestic trophies others don't bother with to keep his rep in tact.
Them beating us twice at the end of the season didn’t help either.Agree with this, I think this season especially we should have played the kids in the league cup. Most seasons the final is in like February, so it can be won and then the team can focus on Prem & CL. But not this year.
It’s so difficult though, we had three weeks rest leading up to last night, whereas Chelsea had basically 5 finals in those three weeks (to secure top-4 and the FA Cup)... which was better preparation for last night? The rest or a string of important games? If you’d asked me yesterday I’d have definitely said three weeks to chill, but now I’m not so sure.
I’ll tell you another thing aswell anyone who thinks the owners will be ok with what happened last are living in fantasy land . Pep will never get sacked and rightly so but there will definitely be a conversation at board level as to why and what went wrong . It isn’t about getting beat as Chelsea are a top top outfit and will be up there next season but we gave them a massive bonus with the team sheet and gave a n elite player like Kante free roam in midfield which will only end one way . Luckily for us Chelsea can’t finish of this game would have been over at half time .It's weird because in the days leading up to the game, discussions about whether to start Dhino or Rodri was the dominant topic of conversation. Maybe Pep couldn't resist chucking a curve ball at that very issue. Love him dearly but his biggest flaw is his tendency to take unnecessary risks in one-off games.
Yeah Rodri has gone from first choice to third in a few weeks.A top class defensive midfielder to replace/rotate with Fernandinho.
It's clear that Pep doesn't rate Rodri.
So, also maybe some new people involved in transfers as who decided to sign an immobile defensive midfielder?
it was over at half time, in fact it was over at 6.45 when the team was announcedI’ll tell you another thing aswell anyone who thinks the owners will be ok with what happened last are living in fantasy land . Pep will never get sacked and rightly so but there will definitely be a conversation at board level as to why and what went wrong . It isn’t about getting beat as Chelsea are a top top outfit and will be up there next season but we gave them a massive bonus with the team sheet and gave a n elite player like Kante free roam in midfield which will only end one way . Luckily for us Chelsea can’t finish of this game would have been over at half time .
Did it work ,no, but it made sense he knew Chelsea would play a back 5 and 2 holding, even the front 3 dropping deep,he knew they would play on the break , so playing Sterling and Mahrez high and wide to try and stretch their block and create space in the middle for Foden, Bernardo, KDB to operate in with Gundogan feeding made complete sense.
Imo, Pep thought that Chelsea's misfiring problems in attack would be enough to outscore them, so a DM in the strict sense of the term wouldn't be necessary. The real challenge was how to break their compact defensive block, Chelsea's main strength since he failed to do so in his last confrontations with Tuchel even if it was with his B-team. Hence Sterling and Mahrez playing wide and no Ferna/Rodri.Playing no conventional dm when he knew they would play long balls in the channels by passsing c.m also made sense. Did the changes work obviously they didn’t but let not pretend there wasn’t a plan to it that made some sense.