Irwell said:
Ducado said:
It's not that well accepted
The theory is well accepted in terms of it not having been disproved, it's just a very difficult thing to prove or disprove. There is little evidence to point to it existing, but there is also little evidence to point to it not existing. Hawking is an advocate of the theory.
It's a comfortable notion that we'd like to believe in as the alternative is scary. That's a little facetious, there are good scientific reasons to believe in a multiverse.
This is hard to explain properly. Basically, everybody is moving through time right now. You can move through space by moving your arm but even if you keep your arm completely still, you are still moving through time. Think of a picture taken of you every millisecond put next to each other. Each picture represents time and movement is just the illusion of watching time go past quickly as the position changes bit by bit.
The problem with this is that it means we move in four dimension from the beginning of our lives, thus we are just one long string of pictures. The issue of this comes down to relative time and relative space. There is no "forward" in time just as there is no "forward" in space. Your perception of what "forward" is changes depending on which direction you are facing in and is almost entirely private to you, just as the same is within time. The consequence of this when applied to the series of pictures is that the pictures in front of you already exist as the notion of "direction" in time is nonsense.
Therefore everything you will ever do is already pre-determined which includes everything from blinking to murdering 300 people and we're just moving through time. The multiverse gives us an out to this - if every possible event that could happen HAS happened then we retain a sense of free will and choice as each decision we make creates a new Universe where that decision didn't occur rather than the alternative.