Whats best for us

blue_paul said:
What's best for City is Chelsea missing out on top four. As per FFP rules, this should mean a curbing of their spending power this summer.
Yes, Arsenal are far more loathsome but they are not a threat. Chelsea have an excellent crop of young players and if they are able to strengthen again this summer could be a strong tip for the title.


What's best for City is SPURS missing out on top 4. That gives us a great chance of signing Gareth Bale.
 
blue_paul said:
What's best for City is Chelsea missing out on top four. As per FFP rules, this should mean a curbing of their spending power this summer.
Yes, Arsenal are far more loathsome but they are not a threat. Chelsea have an excellent crop of young players and if they are able to strengthen again this summer could be a strong tip for the title.

This
 
Pearcey said:
blue_paul said:
What's best for City is Chelsea missing out on top four. As per FFP rules, this should mean a curbing of their spending power this summer.
Yes, Arsenal are far more loathsome but they are not a threat. Chelsea have an excellent crop of young players and if they are able to strengthen again this summer could be a strong tip for the title.

This
Or a simpler reason that facing Spurs or Arse in the Champions League will be a lot easier than facing Chelsea, possibly under Mourinho.
 
Swordfish7 said:
blue_paul said:
What's best for City is Chelsea missing out on top four. As per FFP rules, this should mean a curbing of their spending power this summer.
Yes, Arsenal are far more loathsome but they are not a threat. Chelsea have an excellent crop of young players and if they are able to strengthen again this summer could be a strong tip for the title.


What's best for City is SPURS missing out on top 4. That gives us a great chance of signing Gareth Bale.

It also gives other clubs the same opportunity. It's best for us for Spurs to qualify for CL so that we have a better chance of drawing a weaker team from pot 1 in the CL. Next season I want us to get out of the CL group so I'd rather we didn't draw Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, or Barcelona in the group stage and is also why we need Bayern to beat Dortmund in the final.
 
Marvin said:
tonea2003 said:
what's best for us is win our next 4 games, which we should do, the rest is irrelevant
But when the game is on, you have to take a view on it

It's better for City's 2nd spot for Utd to win, but we all know full well that when it Kicks Off we'll be wanting Chelsea to give Utd another footballing lesson.

Don't think it will happen though. Utd got their celebrations out of the way now, and Chelsea will be tired

as an individual game i would prefer utd not to win, but like i said its irrelevant if we do our job as we should do
 
AntiUnited said:
plz dont believe this if chel$ki dont get 4th they cant attract the best in the world it all comes down to money and they got fuk loads of it. look at that club anzi mahshdahsad. so I hope for a Chelsea to hammer united..

Tell us the list of excellent players who play for Anzhi mate....<br /><br />-- Sun May 05, 2013 4:28 pm --<br /><br />
Swordfish7 said:
blue_paul said:
What's best for City is Chelsea missing out on top four. As per FFP rules, this should mean a curbing of their spending power this summer.
Yes, Arsenal are far more loathsome but they are not a threat. Chelsea have an excellent crop of young players and if they are able to strengthen again this summer could be a strong tip for the title.


What's best for City is SPURS missing out on top 4. That gives us a great chance of signing Gareth Bale.

AWholeNewLevelofStupidity-57312.jpg
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.