Which striker was worst value for money?

[mcfc78]

FOWLER ? 6 MILL
SAMARAS ? 6 MILL
BRADBURY ? 3 MILL
BIANCHI ? 8.5 MILL
BOJINOV ? 6 MILL,, STILL TIME TO PROVE
BELLAMY ? 14 MILL, STILL TIME TO PROVE
VASSELL ? 2.5 MILL
WANCHOPE? 4 MILL

 

[masterwig]

Vuoso.

 

[bluemoonste]

Re: WHICH STRIKER WAS WORSE VALUE FOR MONEY??

Mattias Vuoso ... 6.5 MIL and never played as I remember !!!

 

[The Pink Panther]

Re: WHICH STRIKER WAS WORSE VALUE FOR MONEY??

FOWLER ? 6 MILL
SAMARAS ? 6 MILL
BRADBURY ? 3 MILL
BIANCHI ? 8.5 MILL
BOJINOV ? 6 MILL,, STILL TIME TO PROVE
BELLAMY ? 14 MILL, STILL TIME TO PROVE
VASSELL ? 2.5 MILL
WANCHOPE? 4 MILL

Something wrong that you can't take the caps lock off?

To answer the question. Without doubt Bradbury, as we were totally skint at that time

I'd follow that with Samaras. Don't know what Pearce was thinking, unless he thought he was buying Huntelaar and got mixed up.

 

[bumbleblue]

It has to be Vuoso 5 or 6 million and never played as far as i remember.

 

[DontLookBackInAnger]

It's hard to say because you have to factor in what the money ment to the club at the time. 3m for BRADBURY was worse than 14m for BELLAMY even though he is on a 4 year deal and we will not recover a penny of it.

 

[unitedrunaway]

a very good point there blue... and all the above have a case be it through injury or just not upto the job.. bojinov and bellamy have been a big dissapointment through no fault of their own,, although we all knew bells record.. but i think the biggest flop was bradbury,, he came when we needed inspiration, and just depressed everyone.. to be fair he did come in , when we were at a very lw point..

 

[mancitygaz]

Gerry Creaney

 

[withingtonmcfc]

If Jo really did cost £19m he's got to be up there.

 

[heywood blue]

big fat bob taylor