To be fair to them I think you have to contextualise it. Those games were needed to make the stadium financially viable, so it’s a choice of Wembley semi-finals or no Wembley.
Not playing 2 FA Cup semi-finals doesn’t make Wembley financially unviable. Or didn’t mean it wouldn’t get built.
Wembley was paid off this year. The FA no longer owe money for Wembley. That was always going to be the case regardless of when the FA paid the Wembley debt off.
The argument could now be made that semi-finals, especially for Northern clubs, no longer have to played at Wembley.
The FA would still make a semi-final profit if the semi-finals were played at another stadium in the North of England or at Villa Park.
Last edited: