Why so much complaining?

Robert Jordan said:
Have a look at this: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/mancini-reveals-three-failed-signings-which-wouldve-won-man-city-consecutive-titles-3967496#.Udmm2tiYAzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/ ... dmm2tiYAzY</a>

Sacked Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini says there were three signings he wanted made last summer.

Manchester United beat City for Robin van Persie, while Mancini admits he also wanted Chelsea winger Eden Hazard.

In an interview with Corriere dello Sport, Mancini said: “Immediately after we won the championship, I thought that three transfers were important.

“Van Persie? Everyone knew, it was not a mystery. We had an agreement and he knew he would be the man who made a difference.

“But we did not move, as we didn’t move for Daniele de Rossi and Eden Hazard, purchases I said would win titles. It is no coincidence that the title was won by the team that took van Persie.”
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Robert Jordan said:
Have a look at this: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/mancini-reveals-three-failed-signings-which-wouldve-won-man-city-consecutive-titles-3967496#.Udmm2tiYAzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/ ... dmm2tiYAzY</a>

Sacked Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini says there were three signings he wanted made last summer.

Manchester United beat City for Robin van Persie, while Mancini admits he also wanted Chelsea winger Eden Hazard.

In an interview with Corriere dello Sport, Mancini said: “Immediately after we won the championship, I thought that three transfers were important.

“Van Persie? Everyone knew, it was not a mystery. We had an agreement and he knew he would be the man who made a difference.

“But we did not move, as we didn’t move for Daniele de Rossi and Eden Hazard, purchases I said would win titles. It is no coincidence that the title was won by the team that took van Persie.”
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.

We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe. And we most definitely needed RvP as last season unequivocally proved. He was the difference between us and the title. If we don't sign someone to score as many as him then we'll struggle to win it again this season. Which is disappointing, having come this far we should have hammered home our advantage. Last summer's signings were not the signings of champions. They were mid-table squad players at best.
 
Jack Wills said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Robert Jordan said:
Have a look at this: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/mancini-reveals-three-failed-signings-which-wouldve-won-man-city-consecutive-titles-3967496#.Udmm2tiYAzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/ ... dmm2tiYAzY</a>

Sacked Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini says there were three signings he wanted made last summer.

Manchester United beat City for Robin van Persie, while Mancini admits he also wanted Chelsea winger Eden Hazard.

In an interview with Corriere dello Sport, Mancini said: “Immediately after we won the championship, I thought that three transfers were important.

“Van Persie? Everyone knew, it was not a mystery. We had an agreement and he knew he would be the man who made a difference.

“But we did not move, as we didn’t move for Daniele de Rossi and Eden Hazard, purchases I said would win titles. It is no coincidence that the title was won by the team that took van Persie.”
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.

We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe. And we most definitely needed RvP as last season unequivocally proved. He was the difference between us and the title. If we don't sign someone to score as many as him then we'll struggle to win it again this season. Which is disappointing, having come this far we should have hammered home our advantage. Last summer's signings were not the signings of champions. They were mid-table squad players at best.

Which part of Prestwich Blues' post you cannot understand?
 
Jack Wills said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Robert Jordan said:
Have a look at this: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/mancini-reveals-three-failed-signings-which-wouldve-won-man-city-consecutive-titles-3967496#.Udmm2tiYAzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/ ... dmm2tiYAzY</a>

Sacked Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini says there were three signings he wanted made last summer.

Manchester United beat City for Robin van Persie, while Mancini admits he also wanted Chelsea winger Eden Hazard.

In an interview with Corriere dello Sport, Mancini said: “Immediately after we won the championship, I thought that three transfers were important.

“Van Persie? Everyone knew, it was not a mystery. We had an agreement and he knew he would be the man who made a difference.

“But we did not move, as we didn’t move for Daniele de Rossi and Eden Hazard, purchases I said would win titles. It is no coincidence that the title was won by the team that took van Persie.”
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.

We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe. And we most definitely needed RvP as last season unequivocally proved. He was the difference between us and the title. If we don't sign someone to score as many as him then we'll struggle to win it again this season. Which is disappointing, having come this far we should have hammered home our advantage. Last summer's signings were not the signings of champions. They were mid-table squad players at best.


Wow........parts of our 'support' really have lost it.
.
Embarrassing
 
Davs 19 said:
Jack Wills said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.

We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe. And we most definitely needed RvP as last season unequivocally proved. He was the difference between us and the title. If we don't sign someone to score as many as him then we'll struggle to win it again this season. Which is disappointing, having come this far we should have hammered home our advantage. Last summer's signings were not the signings of champions. They were mid-table squad players at best.


Wow........parts of our 'support' really have lost it.
.
Embarrassing
' ' noted, Davs :-)
 
Jack Wills said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Robert Jordan said:
Have a look at this: <a class="postlink" href="http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/mancini-reveals-three-failed-signings-which-wouldve-won-man-city-consecutive-titles-3967496#.Udmm2tiYAzY" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/ ... dmm2tiYAzY</a>

Sacked Manchester City boss Roberto Mancini says there were three signings he wanted made last summer.

Manchester United beat City for Robin van Persie, while Mancini admits he also wanted Chelsea winger Eden Hazard.

In an interview with Corriere dello Sport, Mancini said: “Immediately after we won the championship, I thought that three transfers were important.

“Van Persie? Everyone knew, it was not a mystery. We had an agreement and he knew he would be the man who made a difference.

“But we did not move, as we didn’t move for Daniele de Rossi and Eden Hazard, purchases I said would win titles. It is no coincidence that the title was won by the team that took van Persie.”
Let me tell you the story behind each of those three transfers.

De Rossi simply didn't want to come. What should we have done?

Hazard had deals in place with us and Chelsea but we wouldn't meet certain financial demands made at the last minute. That's the same as Isco. We have a principle that we won't be held to ransom by agents and we will lose players because of that.

RVP was a done deal for a long time but Mancini was told one forward would have to go to accommodate him (preferably Balotelli who was proving an embarrassment). Either he refused to sell Mario or Mario refused to go so eventually RVP did a deal with the Rags.

So Mancini can claim what he wants but it's not his money he was spending and if we're going to be run like a business then we have to ensure we don't pay out money we don't need or can't afford to.

We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe. And we most definitely needed RvP as last season unequivocally proved. He was the difference between us and the title. If we don't sign someone to score as many as him then we'll struggle to win it again this season. Which is disappointing, having come this far we should have hammered home our advantage. Last summer's signings were not the signings of champions. They were mid-table squad players at best.

But RVP didn't want to play for us. He wanted to go to the rags. His agent used us to increase his wages. It's not enough that we want a guy and are willing to pay what the club wants but the player also has to chose us over the other suiters.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Jack Wills said:
We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe.
What an utterly contemptible thing to post, which says a great deal about your character imo.

Two things. What is so contemptible out stating the bleeding obvious? And who the fuck are you to say anything about my character. Another fucking gobshite keyboard warrior-cum-psychoanalyst.
 
Jack Wills said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Jack Wills said:
We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe.
What an utterly contemptible thing to post, which says a great deal about your character imo.

Two things. What is so contemptible out stating the bleeding obvious? And who the fuck are you to say anything about my character. Another fucking gobshite keyboard warrior-cum-psychoanalyst.


Just be glad his last name is Wills and not Bauer :)
 
Jack Wills said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Jack Wills said:
We can afford anyone, our owner makes a few quid from oil I believe.
What an utterly contemptible thing to post, which says a great deal about your character imo.

Two things. What is so contemptible out stating the bleeding obvious? And who the fuck are you to say anything about my character. Another fucking gobshite keyboard warrior-cum-psychoanalyst.

You've done it again. Your posts say a lot about your character.

GDM, keyboard warrior ? you really do need to give your head a wobble Jack.

Re- read your post that started this conversation and tell me me it doesn't sound as though it was made by an arrogant JCL..........
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.