Why The Hell Would Anyone Want Mancini Sacked ?

[moomba]

Plenty of people have responded, just not with a point of view that matches yours.

 

[Seosa]

I know it's been brought up before, but surely DD is just another not so subtle alias for Disdbury Dick.

 

[DD]

Fair enough. And the "losing might not be such a bad thing" comment was a bit provocative and ill advised..

I agree. It was. However, if that one comment destroys everything else I have ever said then I'm Roberto's lovechild.

The fact is it was an easy comment that they could pick on to try and discredit me, and to airbrush everything else out of reasoned discussion.

I made it easy for them and that was a mistake. However, if it hadn't been for that, then we'd have simply had more "he's wrong so I can't be bothered discussing it as my tea's ready, I have to wash my underpants or I'm going out to drink four cans of Spesh on the local park" etc style of comments.

 

[jay_mcfc]

And so still no-one is intelligent enough to reply to the points. No, you don't have to. Anyone with intelligence can spot, though, that the reason nobody does is because nobody can.

He who shouts and insults loudest wins the argument round here.

You can write 'War and Peace', and then somebody quotes it and says 'crap' and everyone agrees because the retorter has 18,000 posts !:)

It reminds me of the woman who, when there is clearly something wrong, responds to your "what's up love" with a grumpy, "nothing". You know there is, you know there's plenty to say, but they won't say it because they know deep down inside that they are not on safe ground to argue back, because you'd easily win the argument on the basis they are getting het up over trivia.

Same here. Nobody responds to the paragraphs with quotes and discussions, not because I'm not worthy of response, but because they know I will stand my ground and defeat them with even more reasoned responses. ;)

The spirit of debate is dead, because the intelligence isn't there it would seem.

Honestly, where the fuck do you get off? I would quit the whole 'houlier than you' and 'intelligence' stuff if I were you. When we are three points off top with the chance to win tomorrow and take over our biggest rivals, to say what you said is the most moronic thing I've ever heard or read from any blue anywhere. You don't deserve that your points be debated.

 

[the goats backside]

By getting behind the lads do you mean wanting them to win?

If so, I'm in. Any other takers?

Embarrassing this place at times, no bloody wonder no atmosphere at home games

What has this forum got to do with atmosphere at games..? I'd say far less than 5% of our matchday support comes on here, a point missed by most folk.

How i wish you were right

 

[reddishblue]

And so still no-one is intelligent enough to reply to the points. No, you don't have to. Anyone with intelligence can spot, though, that the reason nobody does is because nobody can.

He who shouts and insults loudest wins the argument round here.

You can write 'War and Peace', and then somebody quotes it and says 'crap' and everyone agrees because the retorter has 18,000 posts !:)

It reminds me of the woman who, when there is clearly something wrong, responds to your "what's up love" with a grumpy, "nothing". You know there is, you know there's plenty to say, but they won't say it because they know deep down inside that they are not on safe ground to argue back, because you'd easily win the argument on the basis they are getting het up over trivia.

Same here. Nobody responds to the paragraphs with quotes and discussions, not because I'm not worthy of response, but because they know I will stand my ground and defeat them with even more reasoned responses. ;)

The spirit of debate is dead, because the intelligence isn't there it would seem.

arrogance beyond belief

 

[DD]

Plenty of people have responded, just not with a point of view that matches yours.

We won the Cup and the League is the sum total of reasoned response; along with the you're a dick approach, of course.

No-one has ever responded to individual points made about

1) Tactics - especially on the road
2) Not getting the best out of players
3) The way Balotelli is allowed carte-blanche to do what he wants whilst other players were hung out to dry for less
4) Our form against decent teams this season
5) The fact that he really did have it made for him with the money at his disposal
6) The point that we sometimes fear the opposition too much and don't impose ourselves on them despite us having better players
7) The tinkering with formations and personnel that I think is costing us points.
8) My belief that a decent manager would have walked the league last season without United having to capitulate, after we had totally frittered away a great start
9) The belief that his over-cautious approach cost us many away games over the last winter
10) The fact that his European record is an utter disgrace, with both Inter and City seriously underachieving compared to teams from the same country that finished below them in the league.

There's probably more. I've asked these questions on so many occasions yet nobody ever says, "right, I think you are wrong and this is why you are wrong". It's "you're wrong because you are we won the league and the cup".

No-one has the nerve to answer each point in a civilised manner because they might get proved wrong, they don't want to and are putting their fingers into their ears shouting "la-la-la".

And no, I won't be on here tomorrow night, win, lose or draw, because I will be in the pub - if that's alright! ;)

-- Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:26 pm --

You don't deserve that your points be debated.

You can't. That's why. Admit it. :)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

And so still no-one is intelligent enough to reply to the points. No, you don't have to. Anyone with intelligence can spot, though, that the reason nobody does is because nobody can.

He who shouts and insults loudest wins the argument round here.

You can write 'War and Peace', and then somebody quotes it and says 'crap' and everyone agrees because the retorter has 18,000 posts !:)

It reminds me of the woman who, when there is clearly something wrong, responds to your "what's up love" with a grumpy, "nothing". You know there is, you know there's plenty to say, but they won't say it because they know deep down inside that they are not on safe ground to argue back, because you'd easily win the argument on the basis they are getting het up over trivia.

Same here. Nobody responds to the paragraphs with quotes and discussions, not because I'm not worthy of response, but because they know I will stand my ground and defeat them with even more reasoned responses. ;)

The spirit of debate is dead, because the intelligence isn't there it would seem.

As Bluemoon's fourth most intelligent poster, I object strenuously to this post.

 

[Damocles]

And so still no-one is intelligent enough to reply to the points. No, you don't have to. Anyone with intelligence can spot, though, that the reason nobody does is because nobody can.

That's getting very close to trolling.

 

[DD]

And so still no-one is intelligent enough to reply to the points. No, you don't have to. Anyone with intelligence can spot, though, that the reason nobody does is because nobody can.

That's getting very close to trolling.

I suppose it's a kind of hope that it might anger someone into a reasoned response, but as there quite clearly isn't one, then it would appear to be a forlorn dream. :)