Why, why, why Jo in AJ on the bench, why?

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

Jo's playing no worse than Barry and Milner, to be fair...

 

[mammutly]

Jo is in the way and that's all !

 

[ManCityFC]

Why, somebody enlighten me please, fucking baffled.

howye doin mate...

yeah,me too.
AJ being the "impact" option maybe.

How are you fella? I'm up next week for a few days.

Yes, I guess so but we are so ineffective against them with Jo, all that defending, but fuck all on the break, we have to at least try and score, you can't rely on out and out defending to gain a point, which is what it looks like to me. Still baffled.

 

[citysince88]

It's so we can hit long balls up to him when we're under pressure against the full backs he should be able to hold the ball up for us.

well thats the theory !

 

[Marvin]

I thought Milner had done well

AJ has improved recently in his off the ball work. But we're away from home at Arsenal, and it would be very difficult to justify starting him in front of any of the other midfielders.

As it is we'd be better off with an extra midfielder instead of a forward.

Quite happy with the 1st half - mainly the scoreline

 

[kenzie115]

Mancini obviously thinks Jo will track the full back better than Johnson. We can also aim long balls to him and Johnson probably will be best used as a sub.

 

[weeman19_89]

Johnson is the impact player, if were 1-0 down who would you want to come on more, Johnson or Jo? We've been lucky but held our guard (n the post :p) we have done well Jo has done his job of holding the ball up. Others were lacking in the first half more than Jo.

Well done Mancini.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[TTTCITYBHOY]

as op says,Jo off,AJ on now..

 

[Soulboy]

Didn't Johnson go to his mate's funeral today? Maybe the manager thought it was right to put him on the bench?

But then again, the keyboard warriors on here will know far better than the manager, yet again...

 

[Tricky_Trev]

Here we go again... It's going to be a long 2nd half!