Windrush

[joe123]

Really? Why destroy the cards?

"Downing Street said their disposal was an "operational decision" taken by UK Border Force, to comply with data protection laws, which it did not criticise."

Personally I've no idea why they did it, or if the above statement on the beeb holds any water. Fact is, in 2009 when they were destroyed, they weren't being kicked out of the country.

 

[domalino]

So the decision was made in 2009 to destroy the landing cards, do we know how many years they had to make them redundant or change their minds before they actually destroyed them?

 

[The blue phantom]

So the decision was made in 2009 to destroy the landing cards, do we know how many years they had to make them redundant or change their minds before they actually destroyed them?

Yet the Home Office have said late 2010.
So that puts the lying twat of a Prime minister in charge of this shambles back then

https://news.sky.com/story/downing-...on-to-destroy-windrush-landing-cards-11335554

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...royed-windrush-migrants-records-2010-leaving/

 

[mat]

The PM has lied to the house of parliament. Funnily enough no calls for to resign.

 

[mat]

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

The PM has lied to the house of parliament. Funnily enough no calls for to resign.

Maybe because she didn't lie.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...let-with-claim-labour-destroyed-landing-cards

 

[The blue phantom]

Yep being reported all over now abt her lying, want an horrible **** she Is.

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Yep being reported all over now abt her lying, want an horrible **** she Is.

Where has she lied?
"The decision to destroy the landing cards was taken in 2009 under a Labour government."

 

[Jalfraag]

Where has she lied?

In his mind.

 

[joe123]

Maybe because she didn't lie.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...let-with-claim-labour-destroyed-landing-cards

didn't read the article then. or even the headline.