I've been an ST holder for MCWFC since they moved to the Academy and I've enjoyed what I've seen of women's football, but yer dead right, C. The media will not say anything remotely critical of women's football, and they will avoid any comparison with men's football like the plague. City advertise that it's the 'same game'. It's the same pitch, same laws, same equipment but played to a different dynamic, and it is this that the RDAHMeedya, often fronted by the BBC, who will not pour cold water over the women's game. If you listen to women pundits describing what we've just seen in the first half of a women's game, and then play the same pundits describing the first half of a men's game, the comments are nigh on identical where the two games has been devoid of any comparison, but offer a stark contrast. Compare and contrast the first half hour of City v CFC in this season's PL game and compare/contrast it to the first thirty mins of the FWWC Final and the difference will be the main reason why hordes do not attend women's football matches. I think that there are several kinds of fans that turn up to watch MCWFC: friends and family of the players, City fans who are priced out of the PL games, City fans who can take their family for not much money, and hardy City fans who would watch two snails crawling up a wall if one of 'em had a sky blue shirt.
There are some very talented, technically adept, pacy players within the FAWSL but there is not one who has the pace of Sané, the trickery of Sterling, the sheer power of Aguero, and not even Steph can defend like Vinnie. But if you are after the latter examples of expertise, skill and technique you won't find it in women's football!