Women's Team Thread - 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
What a stupid post. Quality player who played 4 seasons, 124 games and contributed to our success. Bracketed with a totally useless so-called keeper that made us a laughing stock.
Poor from the club.
I know the women's team have top training facilities and a nice stadium at the academy stadium however, I feel like the club doesn't much care about them.

Sure, they'd be happy for them to qualify for the Champions League but aren't terribly bothered if they are successful. They certainly don't seem to go out of their way for them. Maybe I'm wrong buy it is how I see it.
 
Last edited:
Maybe start a gofundme campaign for a statue or a trip to Vegas for her?
What’s your problem? Apart from being a pain. You clearly feel that she does not merit better respect than that shown by the club.
Your opinion. Her goals against the Ragettes alone make her a City Womens Legend.
 
What’s your problem? Apart from being a pain. You clearly feel that she does not merit better respect than that shown by the club.
Your opinion. Her goals against the Ragettes alone make her a City Womens Legend.

I made a joke and you lunged, get over yourself.
 
She shared a ‘thanks’ with possibly one of the worst players to ever play for Manchester City Women. That is worth getting angry over.
If you've got nothing better going on, sure. As it is, it could have been better and that's about it. It doesn't change what she achieved here or how the fans think about her, it's a weird thing to get angry about. Let alone angry enough that you start moving the goalposts from getting any thanks to what she did get not being enough.

She was never going to get a statue or one of the little documentaries, if you're not part of that first crop (Bardsley, Scott, Houghton, Cushing) you get a thanks and that's it. The point isn't that Weir doesn't deserve more, it's that it's weird to single her out. She's a good player who had some great moments, she wasn't a legend.

What a stupid post. Quality player who played 4 seasons, 124 games and contributed to our success. Bracketed with a totally useless so-called keeper that made us a laughing stock.
Poor from the club.
It's nice to know you respect other City players at least.

I know the women's team have top training facilities and a nice stadium at the academy stadium however, I feel like the club doesn't much care about them.

Sure, they'd be happy for them to qualify for the Champions League but aren't terribly bothered if they are successful. They certainly don't seem to go out of their way for them. Maybe I'm wrong buy it is how I see it.
Entirely agree. The questions about the youth set-up (on this thread and elsewhere) back that up for me, they don't seem half as invested in trying to be the best, whether it's with big spending on signings or overwhelming/quality infrastructure. Was interested to see at least one of the post-Euros WSL introduction pieces allude to the funding at City not being as much as at Arsenal or Chelsea.
 
Last edited:
If you've got nothing better going on, sure. As it is, it could have been better and that's about it. It doesn't change what she achieved here or how the fans think about her, it's a weird thing to get angry about. Let alone angry enough that you start moving the goalposts from getting any thanks to what she did get not being enough.

She was never going to get a statue or one of the little documentaries, if you're not part of that first crop (Bardsley, Scott, Houghton, Cushing) you get a thanks and that's it. The point isn't that Weir doesn't deserve more, it's that it's weird to single her out. She's a good player who had some great moments, she wasn't a legend.


It's nice to know you respect other City players at least.


Entirely agree. The questions about the youth set-up (on this thread and elsewhere) back that up for me, they don't seem half as invested in trying to be the best, whether it's with big spending on signings or overwhelming/quality infrastructure. Was interested to see at least one of the post-Euros WSL introduction pieces allude to the funding at City not being as much as at Arsenal or Chelsea.
They even half arse social media for the women too. I understand women's football isn't as big as men's. That said, they are fans out there who will consume every bit put out about the team and its players. They will spend just as big as fans of the men's team. There are fewer of them obviously but they are out there and I suspect the numbers of them are growing.

Assign one person, maybe one full time and one who splits time between men's side and women's side or a kid on work experience. Their job is only social media about the women's team. It is isn't difficult. The more they are out there the better chance the number of fans will grow.
 
Last edited:
They even half arse social media for the women too. I understand women's football isn't as big as men's. That said, they are fans out there who will consume every bit put out about the teak and its players. They will spend just as big as fans of the men's team. There are fewer of them obviously but they are out there and I suspect the numbers of them are growing.

Assign one person, maybe one full time and one who splits time between men's side and women's side or a kid on work experience. Their job is only social media about the women's team. It is isn't difficult. The more they are out there the better chance the number of fans will grow.
Yeah I agree with that as well. I've seen some interesting debates about how to do the social media best - all in one account or split etc - so I get the overall strategy can be difficult, but for example having a City Women twitter account but only using it for match updates and not even announcing signings on there too, means it's a pain in the arse to try and check if you've missed an update on the 'main' account because there'll be about 10 posts for the men's team for every 1 for the women's team. It's like they want you to work harder as a fan.
 
Yeah I agree with that as well. I've seen some interesting debates about how to do the social media best - all in one account or split etc - so I get the overall strategy can be difficult, but for example having a City Women twitter account but only using it for match updates and not even announcing signings on there too, means it's a pain in the arse to try and check if you've missed an update on the 'main' account because there'll be about 10 posts for the men's team for every 1 for the women's team. It's like they want you to work harder as a fan.
Exactly. It shouldn't be more difficult. If someone has to wade through 20+ Twitter posts to find one about the new women's team signing they might just say "Sod it. I have other things that need doing." Attention spans in younger people are not nearly as good as in older people , in general. If they aren't "satisfied " in a very short time they move on.
 
Last edited:
I know the women's team have top training facilities and a nice stadium at the academy stadium however, I feel like the club doesn't much care about them.

Sure, they'd be happy for them to qualify for the Champions League but aren't terribly bothered if they are successful. They certainly don't seem to go out of their way for them. Maybe I'm wrong buy it is how I see it.
Just imagine how the rags feel who receive pitiful “help” in comparison with us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.